Cacho v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
Filing
100
ORDER canceling hearing set for January 31, 2025. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/29/2025. (AR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JOSHUA CACHO, a Florida Resident
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:23-cv-737-CEM-UAM
USHEALTH ADVISORS, LLC and
USHEALTH GROUP, INC,
Defendants.
ORDER
The hearing scheduled for January 31, 2025, was necessitated by the actions of
Plaintiff’s counsel. Indeed, upon his entry to the case on December 11, 2024, counsel was
faced with a recent order from the magistrate judge directing his client to produce discovery
responses by December 16, 2024. (Doc. 62). Counsel did not file a timely appeal of that
discovery order, nor did he seek additional time for compliance. Instead, he waited until
January 2, 2025, to seek reconsideration of the settled order for production while also pushing
forward in an entirely unreasonable attempt to set 10 depositions in multiple states, across
just a few days. These depositions were set in violation of numerous rules.1 At the same time,
and even though his client had previously agreed to the setting and taking of his own
deposition (while he was proceeding pro se), and Plaintiff’s counsel was well-aware of the
In addition to being patently unreasonable, most of the depositions were improperly served;
several were set for locations beyond the 100 miles of the deponent; the record does not show that the
non-party deponents were given the required 14 days-notice found in our local rules; and counsel
wasn’t given the customary 14 days-notice found in our discovery handbook.
1
scheduled deposition, Plaintiff’s counsel declared, just days before, that his client would not
attend.
This is why the hearing was set—to sort out the appropriate remedy for counsel’s
conduct if warranted, and to discuss, as stated in the order, whether and to what extent further
discovery should be allowed. Certainly, Plaintiff will be required to sit for a deposition. The
Court, at the time of setting, left open the possibility of allowing Plaintiff some additional
time for setting some (maybe not all) of the depositions he sought - despite not requesting a
general extension. However, given the flurry of recent filings, including the questionable
motion to compel arbitration and the objections to the prior rulings, the Court will defer the
hearing so that it can take up all outstanding issues, including any appropriate sanctions.
Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for January 31, 2025, is CANCELED and will be
rescheduled by separate notice if appropriate.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on January 29, 2025.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?