Proffitt v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees Under the EAJA; adopting 28 Report and Recommendations. The Motion for an Award of Attorney's Fees Under the EAJA is granted in part to the extent that Plaintiff is awarded a total of $4,659.63 in attorney's fees under the EAJA. However, the Motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/7/2024. (ABP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION WILLIAM CONRAD PROFFITT, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1016-PGB-LHP COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) (Doc. 27 (the “Motion”)), filed January 4, 2024. After considering the parties’ memoranda (Doc. 27), Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price submitted a Report recommending that the Motion be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 28). No parties have filed an objection, and the time to do so has now passed. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation dated January 23, 2024 (Doc. 28), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the EAJA (Doc. 27) is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff is awarded a total of $4,659.63 in attorneys’ fees under the EAJA. 3. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 7, 2024. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?