Briggs v. City of Daytona Beach et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying without prejudice 46 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas or, in the Alternative, Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 1/3/2025. (MKH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

DAMIEN BRIGGS,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 6:23-cv-1662-WWB-LHP

CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH and
ROGER LAWSON,
Defendants

ORDER
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following
motion filed herein:
MOTION: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF
LAW (Doc. No. 46)
FILED:

January 2, 2025

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without
prejudice.
The motion does not comply with the Standing Order on Discovery Motions,
specifically the word limitations. See Doc. No. 22 ¶ 2. The Court also notes that

the subpoena attached to the motion is blank, rendering it unclear what Plaintiff is
seeking to quash. See Doc. No. 46-1, at 3–4.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 3, 2025.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

-2-