Bonilla et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Filing 29

ORDER re 27 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Regarding Defendant's Requested Fifth Inspection of the Subject Property, 28 Defendant's Response in Opposition. It is ORDERED that on or before April 5, 2024, the part ies shall each file a supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, addressing, with citation to applicable legal authority, the issues outlined in this Order. See PDF Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price on 3/26/2024. (MKH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CARLOS BONILLA and CLARIBEL FIGUEROA, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-2289-JSS-LHP SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER This cause comes before the Court on review of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Regarding Defendant’s Requested Fifth Inspection of the Subject Property (Doc. No. 27) and Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 28). Upon review, the Court finds supplemental briefing from the parties appropriate. See Doc. No. 18 ¶ 6. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that on or before April 5, 2024, the parties shall each file a supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, addressing, with citation to applicable legal authority, 1 the following: 1 General citations to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 or 34, or general legal 1. The relevancy of a fifth inspection by a professional engineer, who, according to Defendant, would be the first engineer to conduct an inspection of the subject property. 2. Whether inspections conducted prior to commencement of this lawsuit have any impact on the analysis of whether another inspection should be permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. 3. At what point the number of inspections, under relevant law, becomes duplicative, or causes annoyance/harassment, or would be unduly burdensome under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. 4. Any other issue the parties deem relevant to resolution of Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 27). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 26, 2024. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties principles concerning the scope of discovery, will not alone suffice. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?