Thurman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Plaintiff's Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees. The Court awards Plaintiff $3,172.93 in attorney's fees and $405 in costs. This award will be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel if the United States determines that no federal debt is owed by Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 1/28/2025. (CGW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JOHN WAYNE THURMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 6:24-cv-1015-KCD
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
Plaintiff John Wayne Thurman requests a fee award under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”). (Doc. 30.)1 The
Commissioner does not object to the relief sought. (Id. at 3.) The Court thus
grants the motion.
Earlier in this case, the Court entered an order (Doc. 27) reversing and
remanding the Commissioner’s decision. Thus, as allowed under EAJA,
Plaintiff moves for an award of $3,172.93 in attorney’s fees and $405 in costs.
For Plaintiff to receive a fee and cost award under EAJA, these five
conditions must be met: (1) hhe must file a timely application for attorney’s
fees; (2) his net worth must have been less than $2 million dollars when the
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations have
been omitted in this and later citations.
complaint was filed; (3) he must be the prevailing party in a non-tort suit
involving the United States; (4) the position of the United States must not have
been substantially justified; and (5) there must be no special circumstances
that would make the award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); Comm’r, I.N.S. v. Jean,
496 U.S. 154, 158 (1990). Considering the motion, and with no opposition, the
Court finds these conditions are met.
EAJA fees are determined under the “lodestar” method—the number of
hours reasonably expended on the matter multiplied by a reasonable hourly
rate. Jean v. Nelson, 863 F.2d 759, 773 (11th Cir. 1988). The resulting fee
carries a strong presumption of reasonableness. City of Burlington v. Daque,
505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992). After review of the services provided, the Court finds
the hours expended by the attorneys who worked on this case are reasonable.
(Doc. 30 at 11-12.)
EAJA fees are “based upon prevailing market rates for the kind and
quality of services furnished,” not to exceed $125 per hour unless the Court
determines an increase in the cost of living, or a special factor, justifies a higher
fee. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A). Thus, determining the appropriate hourly rate
is a two-step process. The Court first determines the prevailing market rate;
then, if it exceeds $125.00, the Court determines whether to adjust it. Meyer v.
Sullivan, 958 F.2d 1029, 1033-34 (11th Cir. 1992). The prevailing market rates
must be determined according to rates customarily charged for similarly
2
complex litigation and are not limited to rates specifically for social security
cases. Watford v. Heckler, 765 F.2d 1562, 1568 (11th Cir. 1985). For his counsel,
Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $251.82. (Doc. 30 at 2.) After review, and
considering the rate is uncontested, the Court finds this reasonable.
Plaintiff also filed a “Retainer Agreement-Federal Court Appeal.” (Doc.
30-1.) It provides: “Claimant hereby assigns his right to any attorney fees
awarded under the [EAJA] to attorney [].” (Id.) But Plaintiff acknowledges that
after awarding EAJA fees, the Commissioner will determine whether he owes
a federal debt to the Government. If no debt is owed, the Government will
accept Plaintiff’s assignment, and the fees will be paid directly to counsel. (Doc.
30 at 2.) Thus, the fees awarded should be paid directly to counsel if the United
States Department of Treasury determines that no federal debt is owed by
Plaintiff.
Plaintiff also seeks $405 in costs for the filing fee. Under 28 U.S.C. §
2412, and as enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 1920, that cost is taxable, and the
Court will award it.
It is thus ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees (Doc. 30) is GRANTED,
and the Court awards Plaintiff $3,172.93 in attorney’s fees and $405 in costs.
This award will be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel if the United States
determines that no federal debt is owed by Plaintiff.
3
ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 28, 2025.
Copies: All Parties of Record
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?