Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel

Filing 55

***DOCUMENT TERMINATED*** REPLY to response to motion re 28 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.. (Von Spiegelfeld, Allen) (ERROR: WRONG IMAGE ATTACHED; COUNSEL HAS CONTACTED AND NOTIFIED THE CLERK'S OFFICE; COUNSEL HAS FILED THE CORRECT IMAGE AT ENTRY NO 57 ) Modified on 10/23/2007 (ag).

, ("

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. The Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel

Doc. 55

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN ADMIRALTY

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

Plaintiff
vs.

CIVIL ACTION
Case No. :
8:07- CV- 00616- SDM- MAP

THE UNIDENTIFIED , SHIPWRECKED VESSEL , its apparel , tackle, appurtenances and cargo located within center point
coordinates: (to be provided to the Court
under seal),

in rem Defendant(s).

PLAINTIFF' S REPLY TO CLAIMANT KINGDOM OF SPAIN' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF' S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Plaintiff, Odyssey Marine Exploration,
Inc.

Odyssey ) by and through its
s ("

undersigned counsel and files this , its Reply to Kingdom of Spain

Spain ) Opposition to

Plaintiffs Motion for Order Granting Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Dkt. 42), and in support
thereof states as follows:

1 This Court has already recognized that preliminary injunctions are appropriate in admiralty arrests , and in fact

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or granted a preliminary injunction in Vessels , case number 8:06-CV- 1685- SDM- MAP (Dkt. 19).

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 2 of 6

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Odyssey Has Met All Requirements Necessary to Establish Its Rights Over the
Site.

Spain s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Order Granting Preliminary Injunctive

Relief is based in part upon its argument that Odyssey has failed to meet the pleading
requirements in that it has not adequately identified the property it claims. 2 This argument is
without merit. A

salvor is required to describe the property with reasonable particularity

such that the claimant wil be able to

commence an investigation and form a responsive
Cir.

pleading.

S. v. $38, 000. 00 Dollars in U.S. Currency, 816 F. 2d 1538 , 1548 (11th

1987); Supplemental Rule C(6); Supplemental Rule E(8). Odyssey has clearly set forth the
required information in its Amended Complaint.
Odyssey has located the Defendant Site, disclosed to Spain the general geographical

location of the site and explained that it believes that the material recovered to date is from
an Italian registered
Verified Complaint

passenger liner that sunk in

1915 during World War I.

(Amended
Spain to

18; (Dkt.

29)).

This information is sufficient for

commence an investigation of its claim, considering that they wil also

receive the sealed

geographical information upon their agreement to keep the information confidential.

3 See

Fathom Exploration, LLC v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, etc, in rem, 352

2 Spain s contention wil be fully addressed in Odyssey s Opposition to Spain s Motion to Dismiss , which is incorporated herein. 3 Odyssey also offered to produce a Preliminary Site Assessment which contained detailed archeological information , but Spain s refusal to keep information contained within the PSA confidential and its objection to the protective order has prevented the disclosure of the PSA.

-2-

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 3 of 6

Supp. 2d 1218 ,

1226 (S. D. Ala. 2005).

Accordingly, Odyssey has met the pleading

requirements for in rem claims.

This Court properly granted a Warrant of Arrest on the Defendant Site based upon
Odyssey s initial Verified Complaint and issued an order appointing Odyssey substitute

custodian for the artifacts recovered.

As such,

this Court has recognized Odyssey is the

custodian of the artifacts and Odyssey has properly pled all conditions to being salvor in
possession of the Defendant Wreck Site.

II.

Potential Harm to Odyssey

and to the Defendant

Wreck Site,

Absent a

Preliminary Injunction, Far Outweighs Any Harm to Spain or Any Other Third Party.
Spain incorrectly asserts in its Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Order Granting
Preliminary Injunctive Relief that an injunction would " encompass(J thousands of miles of

ocean " and that the area identified "may include territorial waters of at least Spain ,

and

possibly other European and Afucan nations. "

(Dkt. 42:6) This

is simply not true and is not

what is requested

in Odyssey s Motion.

Odyssey seeks to enjoin third parties from
the

conducting search and/or recovery operations and other actions that would disturb
Defendant Site.

4 (Dkt. 32:

1) The injunction would encompass only that area over which this

Court has already assumed jurisdiction - the defendant res over which it indisputably has
jurisdiction.

See R.

S. Titanic, Inc. v. Haver ,

171 F. 3d 943

, 961 (4th Cir. 1999). In its

Opposition , Spain fails to define any "harm" which would inure to Spain or to any other third

party if the injunction were to be granted. To the contrary, Odyssey, and most importantly,
the Defendant Site, would suffer irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not issued.
4 Odyssey is also prepared to fie under seal a nautical chart depicting the location of the site.

-3-

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 4 of 6

Similarly, Odyssey s Motion does not request this Court to interfere with Spain s lawenforcement activities.

5 The injunctive relief is sought to

properly protect the site and

Odyssey

s activities at the site as recognized by admiralty law.

See Treasure Salvors, Inc. v.
560 , 566 (5th Cir. 1981).

Unidentified Wrecked and Abandoned Sailing Vessel , 640 F. 2d
Odyssey has every reason

to be concerned , based on Spain s prior actions , that if an

injunction is not issued, Spain may take actions which might jeopardize the security of the
Defendant Site, interfering with Odyssey s recognized rights as a salvor in possession.

III.

This Court Has

In Personam

Jurisdiction Over Spain.
jurisdiction over Spain because Spain has actively and

This Court has

in personam

voluntarily decided to intervene in the determination of the ownership of the vessel by filing

a general appearance in its Verified Claim. (Dkt. 14) The Verified Claim of Spain in this
matter did not explicitly state its appearance was being restricted under Supplemental Rule
E(8).
personam.

Accordingly, Spain has entered a
See U. S.

general appearance and is before this Court

v. Republic Marine, Inc. , 829 F. 2d 1399 ,

1402- 1403

(7th Cir. 1987).

Even if Spain had entered a restricted appearance , by the very nature of salvage actions and
the sometimes necessary adjudication of competing ownership claims , this Court necessarily
has in personam

jurisdiction over competing claims of ownership which mayor may not

even include Spain.

See Cobb Coin Co., Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned

Sailing Vessel, 549 F. Supp. 540, 552-553 (S.D. Fla. 1982). Accordingly, this Court has
personam

jurisdiction over Spain and has jurisdiction over the res in dispute. This Court has

5 Spain argues the purpose of the injunction is to interfere with its police power and acts of state. A plain
reading of Odyssey s Motion for Preliminary Injunction clearly shows it is directed at preserving the security of the sensitive archeological site.

- 4-

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 5 of 6

the power to grant Odyssey

s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and should do so.

Alternatively, Plaintiff is in the process of serving Spain pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign
Immunities Act and its express exception to that permits U. S.
courts to exercise jurisdiction

over in rem claims against

a sovereign s vessel.6

28 U.

C.

1605(b). If this Court

determines it has no personal jurisdiction over Spain, Odyssey s motion should be held in
abeyance pending this Court' s obtaining
in personam

jurisdiction following service on Spain.

IV.

Odyssey s Likelihood of Success Under the Law of Salvage is Clear.

Spain asserts in it Opposition that it has unilaterally and unconditionally denied
salvage of any of its property.
allegations in the

This statement,

however, is not supported by any factual

Amended Verified Complaint.

Namely, Plaintiff has alleged that it
Despite these facts

believes the arrested vessel to be an Italian registered passenger vessel.

Spain apparently claims to be the owner of the wreck or have some other, unknown interest

in the wreck. Despite these facts , Spain argues Odyssey can in no way prevail.

Such

conclusory statements fly in the face of the facts contained within the Verified Complaint and

other pleadings. Since Spain has not identified its interest in the Italian registered vessel, its
claims of unauthorized salvage must fail.

Odyssey has demonstrated the likelihood of it

succeeding on the merits and has the right to continue salvage, free from intervention against
all the world under international law.

See Treasure Salvors, Inc. , 640 F.2d at 566;

Titanic, Inc. ,

171 F. 3d at 961.

6 Opposition to Spain s sovereign immunity argument is more fully contained with Odyssey s Opposition to Spain s Motion to Dismiss, which is incorporated herein.

-5-

Case 8:07-cv-00614-SDM-MAP

Document 55

Filed 10/22/2007

Page 6 of 6

In conclusion,

Odyssey has shown it is entitled to a preliminary injunction,

and

Odyssey s Motion for Order Granting Preliminary Injunctive Relief should be granted.
Respectfully submitted

s/ Allen von Spiegelfeld Allen von Spiegelfeld - FBN 256803 avonsp fowlerwhite. com Eric C. Thiel - FBN 016267 ethiel fowlerwhite. com FOWLER WHITE BOGGS BANKER P. O. Box 1438 Tampa , Florida 33601 [phone]
Facsimile: (813) 229- 8313

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 22 , 2007 , I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which wil send a notice of
electronic filing to James A. Goold , Covington & Burling LLP , 1201 Pennsylvania Ave. , Washington, DC 20004; and David C. Banker, Bush Ross P. , 220 S. Franklin Street P. O. Box 3913 , Tampa, FL 33601 Attorneysfor Claimant, Kingdom of Spain.
s/ Allen von Spiegelfeld Allen von Spiegelfeld - FBN 256803 avonsp fowlerwhite. com Eric C. Thiel - FBN 016267 ethiel fowlerwhite. com FOWLER WHITE BOGGS BANKER P. O. Box 1438 Tampa , Florida 33601 [phone]
Facsimile: (813) 229- 8313

Attorneys for Plaintiff
2410192

-6-