Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
ORDER adopting and incorporating 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by James R. Patterson, and affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's claim for supplemental security income benefits. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, and close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/21/2009. (JM)
UNITED
MIDDLE
JAMES R. PATTERSON,
STATES
TAMPA
DISTRICT COURT
OF FLORIDA
DIVISION
DISTRICT
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
CASE NO.
8:08-CV-1081-T-17EAJ
Commissioner of
Security,
Social
Defendant.
ORDER
This
cause
is
before
the Court
on:
Dkt.
19
Report
and Recommendation
This
case
is
a
petition
for
judicial
review of
the denial
of
Plaintiff
income.
James
The
R.
Patterson's
claim for
Judge
supplemental
entered a
security
Report and
assigned Magistrate
has
Reconunendation
in which
it
is
recommended
that
the
decision of
the Commissioner of Social
supported by substantial
error.
Security be affirmed,
and does not
because it
is
evidence
contain
reversible
The Court
has
independently examined the Administrative
Record and the pleadings
Report
in this
case.
No objection to the
After
and
and Recommendation has been
adopts and incorporates
filed.
the
consideration,
Recommendation
the Court
Report
by reference.
Accordingly,
it
is
Case
No.
8:08-CV-1081-T-17EAJ
ORDERED
that
the
Report
and Recommendation the decision claim The of
is adopted and the Commissioner
incorporated by of Social
reference,
and
Security denying income benefits in is
Plaintiff's affirmed. of
for
supplemental Court J. shall
security enter a
Clerk of
final
judgment of Social
favor
Defendant Michael this case.
Astrue,
Commissioner
Security,
and close
DONE and ORDERED
day of July, 2009.
in
Chambers,
in Tampa,
Florida
on
this
21st
LI ZABETH~ft^>KQyACHEVI
United States
D
Copies
to:
All
parties
and
counsel
of
record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?