Sandin et al v. National Financial Services, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant 20 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk is directed to enter Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, National Financial Systems, Inc., in the sum of $2,900.00. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the statutory rate. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and CLOSE this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/9/2009. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION STEPHEN SANDIN and DIANE SANDIN, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. _____________________________________/ Case No. 8:08-cv-1720-T-30EAJ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of a Default Judgment against Defendant (Dkt. 20). A review of the file indicates that on June 18, 2009, a Clerk's default was entered against Defendant National Financial Systems, Inc. (Dkt. 19). It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant (Dkt. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2. The Clerk is directed to enter Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, National Financial Systems, Inc., in the sum of $2,900.00.1 Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the statutory rate. This amount represents statutory damages in the amount of $1,000.00, reasonable attorneys' fees (which this Court determines to be five (5) hours at a rate of $300.00 per hour) in the amount of $1,500.00, and costs in the amount of $400.00. 1 3. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and CLOSE this file. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on July 9, 2009. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record S:\Even\2008\08-cv-1720.defjudg.frm Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?