United States of America v. Segel

Filing 61

ORDER construing Doc. 43 as a motion for default judgment against Estate of Arnold Segel; granting 43 --motion for default judgment; granting 54 --motion for summary judgment against Karen Segel; directing the Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT as directed in the order, TERMINATE any pending motion, and CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/27/2010. (BK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ESTATE OF ARNOLD A. SEGEL, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER The United States sues Karen Segel and the Estate of Arnold A. Segel ("the Estate") to recover unpaid federal income tax, penalties, and interest for the tax years 1997 through 2003. The United States moves (Doc. 43) for "partial summary judgment" against the Estate of Arnold Segel. Unsurprisingly, the Estate fails to respond to the motion; on October 14, 2009, the Clerk entered default (Doc. 27) against the Estate. By virtue of the default, the Estate admits the facts alleged in the complaint. See Cotton v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 402 F.3d 1267, 1278 (11th Cir. 2005). The United States' motion (Doc. 43) for summary judgment is construed as a motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complaint alleges that, as of May 14, 2009, the Secretary of the Treasury assessed income tax, penalties, and interest against the Estate totaling $200,955.48. (Doc. 1, 10) Although the United States notified the defendants of the assessments and demanded payment, the defendants fail to pay. (Doc. 15, 9) The complaint establishes the Estate's indebtedness, and the motion for a default judgment (Doc. 43) is GRANTED. Case No. 8:08-cv-2196-T-23EAJ Additionally, the United States moves (Doc. 54) for summary judgment against the pro se defendant Karen Segel. A March 29, 2010, order (Doc. 55) directs the pro se defendant that, to avoid summary judgment in favor of the United States, she must submit evidence, such as witness statements or documents, countering the facts asserted by the United States. Karen Segel responds (Doc. 60) in opposition to summary judgment but fails to present any evidence challenging the validity of the United States' tax assessments. The unchallenged declaration (Doc. 51-1) attached to the United States' motion for summary judgment establishes that Karen Segel owes the United States $48,179.43, which amount includes $30,104.34 for self-reported income taxes and penalties for the tax year 2000 and $18,075.09 in accumulated interest. Accordingly, the United States' motion (Doc. 54) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment (1) against the Estate of Arnold Segel and in favor of the United States for $203,504.08 plus statutory penalties and interest as provided by law for the period between February 16, 2010, and the date of payment and (2) against Karen Segel and in favor of the United States for $48,179.43 plus all statutory additions as provided by law for the period between March 26, 2010, and the date of payment. Following entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to (1) terminate any pending motion and (2) close the case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on April 27, 2010. xc: Karen Segel -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?