WHYZ Radio, L.P. et al v. D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. et al
Filing
185
ORDER denying 182 Motion to stay pending appeal. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/16/2010. (KAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION DR. GLENN W. CHERRY, ET AL., v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 8:09-cv-33-T-33EAJ
D.B. ZWIRN SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ET AL., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (the "Motion to Stay" Doc. # 182), which was filed on February 1, 2010. Defendant Tama
Broadcasting, Inc. and the "Zwirn Defendants" filed Memoranda in Opposition to the Motion to Stay on February 10, 2010. (Doc. ## 183, 184). For the reasons that follow, the Court
will deny the Motion to Stay. Analysis Plaintiffs seek an order, pursuant to Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, staying this Court's January 27, 2010 order dismissing this case with prejudice. 180). Plaintiffs fail to specify any of the eight subsections of Rule 62 in the Motion to Stay. In addition, Plaintiffs (Doc. #
have demonstrated neither a probable likelihood of success on
the merits on appeal nor that the "balance of the equities" weighs heavily in favor of a stay. See United States v. Hamilton, 963 F.2d 322, 323 (11th Cir. 1992). A stay is considered an "extraordinary relief" for which the moving party bears a "heavy burden." Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Bd. Of Edu. v. Scott, 404 U.S. 1221, 1231 (1971). The
Court agrees with Tama's argument that "the Motion to Stay does not even attempt to address the Plaintiffs' heavy burden of establishing that a stay pending appeal is appropriate in this case." (Doc. # 183 at 3). The Court determines that
Plaintiffs are not entitled to a stay pending appeal. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. # 182) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 16th day of February 2010.
Copies: All Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?