Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
Filing
1093
ORDER of USCA: Motion to strike filed by Appellant Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. is DENIED as to 1027 Notice of appeal filed by Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. EOD: 12/13/13; USCA number: 13-12778-FF. (JNB)
Case: 13-12778
Date Filed: 12/13/2013
Page: 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
John Ley
Clerk of Court
For rules and forms visit
www.ca11.uscourts.gov
December 13, 2013
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES
Appeal Number: 13-12778-FF
Case Style: U.S. Securities and Exchange C v. Quest Energy Management Group,
District Court Docket No: 8:09-cv-00087-RAL-TBM
This Court requires all counsel to file documents electronically using the Electronic Case
Files ("ECF") system, unless exempted for good cause.
The enclosed order has been ENTERED.
Sincerely,
JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court
Reply to: Janet K. Spradlin, FF
Phone #: (404) 335-6178
MOT-2 Notice of Court Action
Case: 13-12778
Date Filed: 12/13/2013
Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-12778-FF
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
BRUCE BELL,
ET AL.,
Intervenors Plaintiffs,
versus
ARTHUR NADEL,
ET AL.,
Defendants,
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORTATION,
ET AL.,
Intervenors,
BURTON W. WIAND,
Receiver - Appellee,
QUEST ENERGY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.,
Movant - Appellant.
-------------------------On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
--------------------------
Case: 13-12778
Date Filed: 12/13/2013
Page: 2 of 2
O R D E R:
Appellant’s “Motion to Strike Answer Brief,” construed as motions to strike the answer
brief in whole or in part, is DENIED.
/s/ CHARLES R. WILSON
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?