Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al

Filing 1093

ORDER of USCA: Motion to strike filed by Appellant Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. is DENIED as to 1027 Notice of appeal filed by Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. EOD: 12/13/13; USCA number: 13-12778-FF. (JNB)

Download PDF
Case: 13-12778 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 John Ley Clerk of Court For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov December 13, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES Appeal Number: 13-12778-FF Case Style: U.S. Securities and Exchange C v. Quest Energy Management Group, District Court Docket No: 8:09-cv-00087-RAL-TBM This Court requires all counsel to file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system, unless exempted for good cause. The enclosed order has been ENTERED. Sincerely, JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court Reply to: Janet K. Spradlin, FF Phone #: (404) 335-6178 MOT-2 Notice of Court Action Case: 13-12778 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12778-FF U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, BRUCE BELL, ET AL., Intervenors Plaintiffs, versus ARTHUR NADEL, ET AL., Defendants, GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORTATION, ET AL., Intervenors, BURTON W. WIAND, Receiver - Appellee, QUEST ENERGY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., Movant - Appellant. -------------------------On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida -------------------------- Case: 13-12778 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 2 of 2 O R D E R: Appellant’s “Motion to Strike Answer Brief,” construed as motions to strike the answer brief in whole or in part, is DENIED. /s/ CHARLES R. WILSON UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?