Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
Filing
1234
SUPPLEMENT re 1230 Order on Motion for Order of SaleOrder on Motion for Order to Show Cause (Supplement to Rec's Unopposed Motion at Docket 1229) by Burton W. Wiand. (Morello, Gianluca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARTHUR NADEL,
SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC,
SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Defendants.
CASE NO.: 8:09-cv-0087-T-26TBM
SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.,
VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.,
VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC.,
VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD,
VICTORY FUND, LTD,
VIKING IRA FUND, LLC,
VIKING FUND, LLC, AND
VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC.
Relief Defendants.
/
SUPPLEMENT TO RECEIVER’S UNOPPOSED, VERIFIED MOTION FOR (1)
APPROVAL OF SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN MARSHFIELD,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, VERMONT AND (2) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On March 15, 2016, Burton W. Wiand, as Receiver (the “Receiver”), filed an
Unopposed Verified Motion For (1) Approval Of Sale Of Real Property Located In Marshfield,
Washington County, Vermont And (2) Order To Show Cause (Doc. 1229) (the “Motion”). In
relevant part, the Motion sought an order requiring Anne Nadel Walbridge (“Ms. Nadel
Walbridge”) and her current husband, Thomas Walbridge (“Mr. Walbridge”), to appear
before the Court and show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failing to (a)
abide by the June 2013 Settlement Agreement between Ms. Nadel Walbridge and the Receiver
(Doc. 1035-1), and the Order approving it (Doc. 1036), and (b) comply with the provisions of
the Order appointing the Receiver (Doc. 8) which prohibit anyone from disturbing the
Receivership’s assets (id. ¶ 15). The Receiver requested this relief because he was unable to
obtain a quitclaim deed executed by Ms. Nadel Walbridge and Mr. Walbridge deeding to the
Receiver any remaining interests they may have in the real property underlying the Motion.
The Court subsequently entered an Order granting this relief (Doc. 1230) and setting a
hearing on March 25, 2016, at 11 a.m., for Ms. Nadel Walbridge and Mr. Walbridge to appear
and show cause why they should not be held in contempt. Ms. Nadel Walbridge and Mr.
Walbridge were served with a copy of the Motion and the Order (see Docs. 1232 & 1233).
Yesterday afternoon, Ms. Nadel Walbridge and Mr. Walbridge executed a quitclaim
deed, and consequently the Receiver no longer needs the relief sought in the Motion against
Ms. Nadel Walbridge and Mr. Walbridge. Accordingly, the Receiver respectfully asks the
Court to (1) cancel the show cause hearing and (2) discharge its Order to Ms. Nadel Walbridge
and Mr. Walbridge to show cause why they should not be held in contempt.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 23, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that I will provide
copies of this supplement as follows:
Anne Nadel Walbridge
6274 VT Route 14
Williamstown, VT 05679
Via email
Thomas Walbridge
6274 VT Route 14
Williamstown, VT 05679
Via Anne Nadel Walbridge’s email
2
Matthew Farmer, Esq.
Farmer & Fitzgerald, P.A.
102 W. Whiting St.
Suite 501
Tampa, FL 33602
Via email
s/Gianluca Morello
Gianluca Morello, FBN 034997
gmorello@wiandlaw.com
Michael S. Lamont, FBN 0527122
mlamont@wiandlaw.com
Jared J. Perez, FBN 0085192
jperez@wiandlaw.com
WIAND GUERRA KING P.A.
5505 W. Gray Street
Tampa, FL 33609
Tel: 813-347-5100
Fax: 813-347-5198
Attorneys for the Receiver
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?