Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
Filing
1242
Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 11(c), the Clerk of the District Court for the Middle District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for the purposes of this appeal re: 1226 Notice of appeal. The following documents will be forwarded in paper format upon the request for the record on appeal by the USCA in addition to the electronic record. Volume of pleadings: 1 volume USCA number: 16-10942-GG (KMM) (KMM).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse
Office of the Clerk
801 North Florida Avenue
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 301-5400
www.flmd.uscourts.gov
Sheryl L. Loesch
Clerk
Keshia M. Jones
Tampa Division Manager
DATE: July 19, 2016
TO:
Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM
ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC, SCOOP
MANAGEMENT, INC., SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.,
VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.,
VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC., VICTORY IRA
FUND, LTD., VICTORY FUND, LTD., VIKING IRA
FUND, LLC, VIKING FUND, LLC, VIKING
MANAGEMENT, LLC, CITY OF VENICE,
CARRELAGE MULTI-STRATEGY OFFSHORE FUND,
LTD., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., KELVIN
V. LEE, MARTY HUPPERT, ANNE NADELWALBRIDGE, CHOICE DIRECT MAIL, INC. and
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO. SUCCESSOR TO
COLONIAL BANK NA,
Defendants.
U.S.C.A. Case No.:
16-10942-GG.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 11(c), the Clerk of the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida hereby certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal. The record,
including the transcript of parts thereof designated for inclusion and all necessary exhibits, consists of:
Honorable Richard A. Lazzara, United States District Judge appealed from.
Record as Requested:
1 volume of sealed documents
SHERYL L. LOESCH, CLERK
By:
s/K. M., Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?