Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al

Filing 1242

Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 11(c), the Clerk of the District Court for the Middle District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for the purposes of this appeal re: 1226 Notice of appeal. The following documents will be forwarded in paper format upon the request for the record on appeal by the USCA in addition to the electronic record. Volume of pleadings: 1 volume USCA number: 16-10942-GG (KMM) (KMM).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse Office of the Clerk 801 North Florida Avenue Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 301-5400 Sheryl L. Loesch Clerk Keshia M. Jones Tampa Division Manager DATE: July 19, 2016 TO: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC, SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC., SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P., VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC., VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD., VICTORY FUND, LTD., VIKING IRA FUND, LLC, VIKING FUND, LLC, VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, CITY OF VENICE, CARRELAGE MULTI-STRATEGY OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., KELVIN V. LEE, MARTY HUPPERT, ANNE NADELWALBRIDGE, CHOICE DIRECT MAIL, INC. and BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO. SUCCESSOR TO COLONIAL BANK NA, Defendants. U.S.C.A. Case No.: 16-10942-GG. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 11(c), the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida hereby certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal. The record, including the transcript of parts thereof designated for inclusion and all necessary exhibits, consists of:  Honorable Richard A. Lazzara, United States District Judge appealed from.  Record as Requested: 1 volume of sealed documents SHERYL L. LOESCH, CLERK By: s/K. M., Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?