Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al

Filing 481

ORDER ATTACHED granting #475 Motion to Compel and denying #479 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 9/3/2010. (CCB)

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al Doc. 481 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT M I D D L E DISTRICT OF FLORIDA T A M P A DIVISION S E C U R IT IE S AND EXCHANGE C O M M IS S IO N , P la in tif f , v. A R T H U R NADEL; SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC; a n d SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC., D e f e n d a n ts, S C O O P REAL ESTATE, L.P.; VALHALLA IN V E S T M E N T PARTNERS, L.P.; VALHALLA M A N A G E M E N T , INC.; VICTORY IRA FUND, L T D .; VICTORY FUND, LTD.; VIKING IRA F U N D , LLC; VIKING FUND, LLC; and V IK IN G MANAGEMENT, LLC, R e lie f Defendants. / C A S E NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM ORDER Upon due consideration of the parties' written submissions and oral arguments, together with the procedural history of this case, and for the reasons announced on the record at the hearing held in this case this day, it is ordered and adjudged as follows: 1) The Receiver's Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Compliance With NonParty Subpoena (Dkt. 475) is granted. Counsel for Managed Capital, LLC, shall produce to the Receiver on or before September 7, 2010, all documents in his possession which are responsive Dockets.Justia.com to the subpoena. Counsel shall also produce on or before September 17, 2010, all documents responsive to the subpoena received after the initial production. 2) Non-Party Donald H. Rowe's Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 479) is denied based on the same reasons set forth in the Court's earlier order entered June 24, 2010, at docket 424. D O N E AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on September 3, 2010. s/Richard A. Lazzara RICHARD A. LAZZARA U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE COPIES FURNISHED TO: C o u n s e l of Record -2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?