Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
NOTICE of compliance re 739 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Appoint Appraisers Receivers Motion to Appoint AppraisersPursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2001 to Appraise Receivership Real Property In Graham, North Carolina, 741 Order Local Rule 3.01(G) Certification For Docket Entry #739 by Burton W. Wiand (Keefe, Sean)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC,
SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC.,
CASE NO.: 8:09-cv-0087-T-26TBM
SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.,
VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.,
VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC.,
VICTORY FUND, LTD,
VIKING IRA FUND, LLC,
VIKING FUND, LLC, AND
VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC.
LOCAL RULE 3.01(g) CERTIFICATION for DOCKET ENTRY #739
Pursuant to this Court’s Order dated February 9, 2012, Counsel for the Receiver has
personally conferred with counsel for Wells Fargo as to their official position regarding
Receiver’s Motion to Appoint Appraisers
Pursuant to 28 US.C. §2001 To Appraise Real
Property in Graham, North Carolina (Doc. 739). Counsel for Wells Fargo has advised that Wells
Fargo does not object to the proposed appraiser Thomas J. Skeahan, but does object to proposed
appraisers Roscoe W. Shiplett and Mark A. Morgan.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 14, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that on February 14, 2012, I mailed the foregoing document
and the notice of electronic filing by first-class mail to the following non-CM/ECF participants:
Arthur Nadel, Register No. 50690-018
FCI BUTNER LOW
Federal Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 999
Butner, NC 27509
JAMES, HOYER, NEWCOMER &
/s/ Sean P. Keefe
Sean P. Keefe, Esq. (FBN 413828)
One Urban Centre, Suite 550
4830 W. Kennedy Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33609
Telephone: (813) 397-2300
Facsimile: (813) 397-2310
Attorney for the Receiver, Burton W. Wiand
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?