Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al

Filing 750

Unopposed MOTION to extend time to file Memorandum by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Cream, Anita)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM ARTHUR NADEL; SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC; and SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants, SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P.; VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.; VALHALLA MANAGEMENT, INC.; VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD.; VICTORY FUND, LTD.; VIKING IRA FUND, LLC; VIKING FUND, LLC; and VIKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, Relief Defendants. UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, on behalf of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), hereby moves the Court for a one-week extension of time to file its memorandum in the above-captioned case, as directed by the Court in its Order filed February 3, 2012. The United States needs the brief extension because the Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”) in the Southern District of New York who is responsible for filing the memorandum, Jeffrey Alberts, is unable to do so by tomorrow due to illness. AUSA Alberts has been running a fever for the past five days and yesterday was diagnosed with pneumonia and ordered to stay home. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (“USAO-SDNY”) has conferred with counsel for the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); the SEC Receiver; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A.; and TRSTE, Inc., all of whom consent to the requested extension. In support of its motion, the United States submits the following memorandum of law. MEMORANDUM OF LAW I. Procedural History On February 3, 2012, this Court issued an Order (the “Order”) (Doc. 733) in connection with the December 7, 2011 motion of the SEC Receiver (Doc. 675) and oppositions to the motion filed by several entities, including Wells Fargo and TRSTE, Inc. (“TRSTE”) (Doc. 677, 689 & 690). In the Order, the Court directed the USAO-SDNY to file a memorandum on or before February 23, 2012, outlining its understanding of any agreement reached between the Receiver and the Government with regard to the effect of the forfeiture order on this Court’s authority to liquidate Defendant Nadel’s assets in order to compensate the victims of Nadel’s criminal activities, and the legal basis for such agreement. See Doc. 733 at 4, ¶ 5. 2 Jeffrey Alberts, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, has been primarily responsible for asset forfeiture matters in connection with the Nadel prosecution virtually since its inception in the USAOSDNY, and is responsible for filing the memorandum due February 23, 2012 in the above-captioned case. However, AUSA Alberts has been running a fever for the past five days and yesterday was diagnosed with pneumonia. His doctor directed him to stay home. AUSA Alberts is therefore not able to complete and file the memorandum within the prescribed time period. II. Local Rule 3.01(g) Certification The USAO-SDNY has conferred with counsel for the SEC; the SEC Receiver; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A.; and TRSTE, Inc., all of whom consent to the requested extension. III. Applicable Law Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) provides, in pertinent part, that the Court may extend the time to respond to a motion for good cause “with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). The requested extension is necessary because the AUSA who is familiar with and responsible for filing the memorandum is unable to do so because of illness. Moreover, the requested extension will not cause any undue delay or prejudice. 3 IV. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the United States requests that the Court extend the time for the USAO-SDNY to file the memorandum directed by the Court in its February 3, 2012 Order (see Doc. 733, at 4, ¶ 5) from February 23, 2012, to March 1, 2012. Respectfully submitted, ROBERT E. O’NEILL United States Attorney By: s/Anita M. Cream ANITA M. CREAM Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar Number 56359 400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200 Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 274-6000 - telephone (813) 274-6220 - facsimile E-mail: anita.cream@usdoj.gov 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 22, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: Scott A. Masel, Attorney Advisor Division of Enforcement Securities and Exchange Commission 801 Brickell Ave., Suite 1800 Miami, FL 33131 Tel.: 305-982-6398 Fax: 305-536-4154 Email: masels@sec.gov Ana T. Barnett, Esquire Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Weissler, Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. Counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. Counsel for TRSTE, Inc. 150 W. Flagler St., Suite 2200 Miami, FL 33130 Tel.: 305-789!3514 Fax: 305-789!3395 Email: abarnett@stearnsweaver.com Louis Joseph Shaheen, Jr. Akerman Senterfitt Counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 401 E. Jackson St., Suite 1700 Tampa, FL 33602!5803 Tel.: 813!209!5016 Fax: 813!223!2837 Email: joseph.shaheen@akerman.com 5 Gianluca Morello, Esquire Wiand Guerra King, P.L. Counsel for Receiver Burton W. Wiand, Esquire 3000 Bayport Dr., Suite 600 Tampa, FL 33607 Tel.: 813-347-5100 Fax: 813-347-5155 Email: gmorello@wiandlaw.com I further certify that on February 22, 2012, I mailed the foregoing document and the notice of electronic filing by first-class mail to the following non-CM/ECF participant: Arthur G. Nadel Reg. No. 50690-018 FCI Butner Low Federal Correctional Institution P.O. Box 999 Butner, NC 27509 s/Anita M. Cream ANITA M. CREAM Assistant United States Attorney 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?