Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
DECLARATION of of Jonathan Cohen in Support of the Receiver's Opposition to Motion of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (I) for Determination That the Filing of Proofs of Claim Herein Is Not Necessary to Preserve Secured Creditors' Valid State Law Security Interests In, and Claims Against, Collateral in the Receiver's Possession, or in the Alternative, (II) for Leave to File Late Claims re 755 Response in opposition to motion by Burton W. Wiand. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Cohen, Jonathan)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?