Wiers Farm, Inc. v. Waverly Farms, Inc. et al
Filing
189
ORDER: LSQ's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 188 is GRANTED as set forth herein. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/18/2011. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
WIERS FARM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 8:09-cv-1742-T-30TBM
WAVERLY FARMS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon LSQ’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and
Costs (Dkt. 188). LSQ represents in its motion that W.J. Produce does not oppose LSQ’s
entitlement to fees as the prevailing party of the breach of contract claim. Accordingly, the
Court grants LSQ’s motion, solely as to the issue of its entitlement to fees.1
The Court agrees with LSQ that the issue of the amount of fees, which is opposed by
W.J. Produce, should be deferred. Given the fact that this case is set for trial during the
Court’s May 2011 trial calendar, the Court will provide LSQ twenty (20) days from the
conclusion of the trial (i.e., the last day of trial) to submit an affidavit of its fees and expenses
related to the breach of contract claim, which shall attach supporting invoices and/or time
entries. W.J. Produce shall have twenty (20) days from the filing of LSQ’s affidavit to file
1
The entitlement is based on the no-offset agreement executed by W.J. Produce, which states that
“the prevailing party shall recover its attorney’s fees and expenses from the unsuccessful party.”
an opposition to the amount of fees. If the amount is unopposed, LSQ shall reflect this in its
filing.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that LSQ’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs (Dkt. 188) is hereby GRANTED as set forth herein.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on April 18, 2011.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2009\09-cv-1742.LSQmtfees186.frm
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?