Bruggemann, et al. vs. Amacore Group, et al.

Filing 227

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 218 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Answer and Counterclaim and Alternatively to Strike Defendants' Supplemental Discovery Responses and Portions of Defendants' Initial Discovery Responses 161 is DENIED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 5/19/2011. (LN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION

TY BRUGGEMANN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 8:09-CV-2562-T-30MAP

AMACORE GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation
submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. #218) and the Objection (Dkt. #222)
filed thereto.
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, the Objection, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the
Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be
adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.
ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #218) of the Magistrate Judge is

adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all
purposes, including appellate review.
Page 1 of 2

2.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants’ Answer and Counterclaim and

Alternatively to Strike Defendants’ Supplemental Discovery Responses and Portions of
Defendants’ Initial Discovery Responses (Dkt. #161) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on May 19, 2011.

Copies Furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2009\09-cv-2562.adopt 218.wpd

Page 2 of 2