Wiand v. Lee et al

Filing 94

ORDER adopting 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 62 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Supporting Memorandum of Law filed by Vernon M. Lee and incorporating by reference; the objection of the Receiver be overruled; and the motion for judgment on the pleadings 62 be denied. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/12/2012. (SN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE BURTON W. WIAND, as Receiver for VALHALLA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.; VIKING FUND, LLC; VIKING IRA FUND, LLC; VICTORY FUND, LTD.; VICTORY IRA FUND, LTD., AND SCOOP REAL ESTATE, L.P., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 8:10-cv-210-T-17MAP VERNON M. LEE, individually and as Trustee of the Vernon M. Lee Trust, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on February 13, 2012, wherein the Magistrate Judge recommended that the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 62) be denied. Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc). The defendant filed objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 92). STANDARD OF REVIEW When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia, 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation, February 13, 2012, be 2 adopted and incorporated by reference; the objection of the Receiver be overruled; and the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 62) be denied. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 12th day of March, 2012. Copies to: All parties and counsel of record Assigned Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?