Madura et al v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 60

ORDER: The following motions are denied as moot due to the dismissal of this action with prejudice: Plaintiff Anna Dolinska-Maduras Sworn Emergency Motion for Protective Order Allowing Her to Argue Her Case in Writing Instead of at Hearing 55 ; Pla intiffs Sworn Motion to Continue the July 20, 2010 Hearing 56 ; Plaintiffs Motion to Treat their Two Supplements as Supplemental Exhibits 58 ; and Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Directing Bank of America and its Counsel to Obey Federal and th is Courts Local Rules Governing Filing, Serving, Signing the Certificate of Service 59 . Any further impertinent motions filed by pro se Plaintiffs in this dismissed case will be stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/22/2010. (KAK)

Download PDF
Madura et al v. Bank of America, N.A. Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ANDRZEJ MADURA and ANNA DOLINSKAMADURA, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 8:10-cv-523-T-33AEP BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On July 16, 2010, this Court entered an Order dismissing this case with prejudice. (Doc. # 51). As such, the Court finds it appropriate to deny as moot the following motions filed by the pro se Plaintiffs: (1) Plaintiff Anna Dolinska-Madura's Sworn Emergency Motion for Protective Order Allowing Her to Argue Her Case in Writing Instead of at Hearing (Doc. # 55); (2) Plaintiffs' Sworn Motion to Continue the July 20, 2010 Hearing (Doc. # 56); (3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Treat their Two Supplements as Supplemental Exhibits (Doc. # 58); and (4) Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Directing Bank of America and its Counsel to Obey Federal and this Court's Local Rules Governing Filing, Serving, Signing the Certificate of Service (Doc. # 59). Further, the Court notes that any further impertinent motions filed by pro se Plaintiffs in this dismissed case will be stricken pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil 1 Dockets.Justia.com Procedure. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: The following motions are denied as moot due to the dismissal of this action with prejudice: (1) Plaintiff Anna Dolinska-Madura's Sworn Emergency Motion for Protective Order Allowing Her to Argue Her Case in Writing Instead of at Hearing (Doc. # 55); (2) Plaintiffs' Sworn Motion to Continue the July 20, 2010 Hearing (Doc. # 56); (3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Treat their Two Supplements as Supplemental Exhibits (Doc. # 58); and (4) Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Directing Bank of America and its Counsel to Obey Federal and this Court's Local Rules Governing Filing, Serving, Signing the Certificate of Service (Doc. # 59). DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 22nd day of July 2010. Copies: All Counsel and Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?