Cargill v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest

Filing 31

ORDER ATTACHED striking 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 4/29/2011. (CCB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
ETHEL CARGILL,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO: 8:10-cv-807-T-26TGW

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
OF THE MIDWEST,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
Upon due consideration, it is ordered and adjudged that Defendant’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Dkt. 30) is stricken pursuant to paragraph 6(g) of the Court’s Case
Management and Scheduling Order (the CMSO) entered June 16, 2010, at docket 16, for failure
to comply with paragraph 6(b) of the CMSO. Because discovery does not conclude until July 29,
2011, and because the dispositive motion filing deadline is not until August 29, 2011, defense
counsel is reminded that pursuant to paragraph 6(a) of the CMSO “[a] party’s claims or defenses
for which summary judgment is sought shall be presented in a single motion and incorporated
memorandum of law . . . Multiple motions for summary judgment will not be permitted.”
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on April 29, 2011.

s/Richard A. Lazzara
RICHARD A. LAZZARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO:

Counsel of Record