Travaglio v. American Express Company et al

Filing 57

ORDER: Plaintiff-Appellant Tina Marie Travaglio is directed to submit a response to the jurisdictional questions reproduced in this Order on or before March 21, 2013. Defendants-Appellees are directed to submit any additional information they would l ike the Court to consider regarding the jurisdictional questions on or before March 21, 2013. If no additional information is submitted by Defendants-Appellees, the Court will consider the response submitted to the Eleventh Circuit by American Express and HealthExtras on November 8, 2012, and the response submitted to the Eleventh Circuit by Bank of Newport on November 14, 2012, in determining citizenship of the parties. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/12/2013. (LRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TINA MARIE TRAVAGLIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Case No. 8:10-cv-1311-T-33AEP AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. _____________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Eleventh Circuit’s Limited Remand Order issued March 1, 2013. (Doc. # 56). For the reasons that follow, PlaintiffAppellant Tina Marie Travaglio is directed to submit a response to the jurisdictional questions reproduced in this Order on or before Defendants-Appellees March American 21, 2013. Express Furthermore, Company, if American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (together, “American Express”), HealthExtras, Inc.,1 or Bank of Newport wish to submit any additional information for consideration regarding the jurisdictional questions, they are directed 1 During the course of this action, HealthExtras, Inc. has also been known as Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. (Doc. # 15 at 1) and is currently known as Catamaran Health Solutions, LLC (Am. Ex. Resp. at 2). In the interest of clarity, the entity is referred to as HealthExtras throughout this Order. to do so on or before March 21, 2013. If no additional information is submitted by Defendants-Appellees, the Court will rely on the response submitted to the Eleventh Circuit by American Express and HealthExtras on November 8, 2012 (Am. Ex. Resp.), and the response submitted to the Eleventh Circuit by Bank of Newport on November 14, 2012 (Bank Resp.), to determine citizenship of the parties. Discussion On June 9, 2010, Travaglio filed a one count complaint against Defendants-Appellees. (Doc. # 1). The single count was titled “Count 1 - Deception, Fraud, Bad Faith, Conspiracy Florida Statutes 624.155(b), et al.” (Id. at 4). American Express and Bank of Newport moved to dismiss the complaint 12(b)(6) pursuant (Doc. to 10, ## Federal 25), Rule and of Civil Procedure HealthExtras moved to dismiss the complaint and to quash service of process (Doc. # 15). Travaglio filed responses in opposition to the motions. (Doc. ## 12, 29, 28). On February 9, 2011, the Court granted Defendants- Appellees’ motions with prejudice and dismissed the case. (Doc. # 42). Travaglio filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh October Circuit 31, on 2012, November the 7, 2011. Eleventh 2 (Doc. # Circuit 52). On issued jurisdictional whether questions complete diversity to the exists parties in the to ascertain case. American Express and HealthExtras responded to the jurisdictional questions on November 8, 2012. Bank of Newport filed a response to the jurisdictional questions on November 14, 2012, adopting and incorporating by reference American Express and HealthExtras’ responses to the three questions. Plaintiff failed to file a response to the questions. On its own motion, the Eleventh Circuit remanded the case to this Court “for the limited purpose of determining the citizenship of all parties at the time the action was filed.” (Doc. # 56 at 2). The Court will consider responses to the jurisdictional questions in determining citizenship of the parties. The jurisdictional questions are follows: 1. Address whether this case involves a “direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). If so, address what effect this has on the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), (c)(1)(A). 2. Address whether the pleadings sufficiently alleged diversity of the parties so as to invoke the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction in this case, specifically the citizenship of: a. plaintiff Tina Marie Travaglio. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. por A. v. Lama, 633 F.3d 1330, 1342 n.12 3 as (11th Cir. 2011) (noting that the complaint must allege the citizenship, not residence, of individuals); AND b. the various defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1); Am. Motorists Ins. Co. v. Am. Emp. Ins. Co., 600 F.2d 15, 16 n.1 (5th Cir. 1979) (stating that a corporation is deemed a citizen of every state by which it has been incorporated and of the state where it has its principal place of business, and that the plaintiffs are required to provide this information in their pleadings). 3. If diversity jurisdiction was not established in the district court, address whether an amendment of the allegations of jurisdiction is now required. 28 U.S.C. § 1653; Mallory & Evans Contractors & Eng’rs. LLC v. Tuskegee Univ., 663 F.3d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Plaintiff-Appellant Tina Marie Travaglio is directed to submit a response to the jurisdictional questions reproduced in this Order on or before March 21, 2013. (2) Defendants-Appellees are directed to submit any additional information they would like the Court to consider regarding the jurisdictional questions on or before March 21, 2013. If no additional information is submitted by consider the Circuit by Defendants-Appellees, response American submitted Express 4 and the to Court the will Eleventh HealthExtras on November 8, 2012, and the response submitted to the Eleventh Circuit by Bank of Newport on November 14, 2012, in determining citizenship of the parties. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 12th day of March, 2013. Copies: All Counsel of Record 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?