Villacis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 13

ORDER in Case No. 8:10-cv-1819-T-23TGW consolidating cases: 8:10-cv-1820-T-23TBM; 8:10-cv-1821-T-23AEP; 8:10-cv-1822-T-23TBM; 8:10-cv-1827-T-23TGW; 8:10-cv-1828-T-23AEP; 8:10-cv-1829-T-23MAP; 8:10-cv-1830-T-23MAP; 8:10-cv-1845-T-23TGW; 8:10-cv-1846-T -23TBM; 8:10-cv-1847-T-23EAJ; and 8:10-cv-1848-T-23TGW. Directing the parties to identify the consolidated action in every filed paper; directing the Clerk to DESIGNATE Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun, III, as the magistrate judge assigned to each case, to TERMINATE motions to dismiss by the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office and the City of Tampa, and to TERMINATE the answer filed by William Gergel; permitting the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, The City of Tampa, and William Gergel to re-file in the consolidated action by 10/11/2010 the motions and answer. (motions 11 and 12 are terminated.) Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/1/2010. (BK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JESSICA RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF TAMPA, MATTHEW ZALANSKY, and WILLIAM GERGEL, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER The defendants City of Tampa, Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, and William Gergel move unopposed (Docs. 8 and 9) under Rule 42, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to consolidate with this action the following actions: 8:10-cv-1820-T-23TBM 8:10-cv-1821-T-23AEP 8:10-cv-1822-T-23TBM 8:10-cv-1827-T-23TGW 8:10-cv-1828-T-23AEP 8:10-cv-1829-T-23MAP 8:10-cv-1830-T-23MAP 8:10-cv-1845-T-23TGW 8:10-cv-1846-T-23TBM 8:10-cv-1847-T-23EAJ 8:10-cv-1848-T-23TGW Each of the twelve actions (1) involves the same defendants, (2) asserts the same claim against each defendant, (3) arises from the same criminal investigation, and (4) involves common issues of law and fact. Furthermore, each plaintiff retains the same counsel. Rule 42 aims to "`avoid unnecessary costs of delay,' and hence the decision to invoke the rule is entirely within the discretion of the district court as it seeks to promote CASE NO.: 8:10-cv-1819-T-23TGW the administration of justice." Gentry v. Smith, 487 F.2d 571, 581 (5th Cir. 1973) (quoting Rule 42(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Young v. City of Augusta, Ga., 59 F.3d 1160, 1169 (11th Cir. 1995) (finding that "[d]istrict court judges in this circuit `have been `urged to make good use of Rule 42(a) . . . in order to expedite the trial and eliminate unnecessary repetition and confusion[.]''") (quoting Gentry)). Upon review, because these actions involve common questions of law and fact and because consolidation promotes the efficient administration of justice, the defendants' unopposed motions (Docs. 8 and 9) are GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson, assigned to the first-filed action, recuses himself in a case involving the City of Tampa police department. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to (1) consolidate each of the above-listed actions with this action; (2) designate Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun, III, as the magistrate judge assigned to each action, (3) terminate the motions to dismiss filed by the defendants Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office and the City of Tampa, and (4) terminate the answer filed by William Gergel. The parties shall identify this action in every paper filed by including in the style of the case the case number 8:10-cv-1819-T23TGW (Consolidated). The defendants Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, the City of Tampa, and William Gergel may re-file the motions and the answer in the consolidated action no later than October 11, 2010. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 1, 2010. -2- -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?