Myers et al v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion for attorney fees. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 5/31/2012. (TJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BARBARA MYERS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:11-cv-00173-T-MAP MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney’s fees (doc. 24). Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,812.09. On February 23, 2012, I ordered the Commissioner’s decision be reversed and the case remanded for further administrative review (doc. 22) and on the same day, February 23, 2012, judgment was entered in favor of the Plaintiff (doc. 23). Thus, a final judgment was rendered in this action and the Plaintiff is the prevailing party. Plaintiff now requests that if the United States Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, Plaintiff’s assignment of the EAJA fees be recognized and paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to a purported attached assignment. No such assignment is attached and counsel has not responded to the court’s inquiry. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to the EAJA (doc. 24) is granted to the extent that the attorney’s fees are to be paid directly to Plaintiff. 3. In all other respects, the motion is denied. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on May 31, 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?