Myers et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
30
ORDER granting 28 Motion for reconsideration. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo on 6/22/2012. (TJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
BARBARA MYERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO.: 8:11-cv-173-T-MAP
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (doc. 28) of
the Court’s Order on attorney fees (doc. 27). Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act
(“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,812.09.
Because Plaintiff’s counsel previously failed to attach an assignment, and also failed to
respond to this Court’s inquiry, the Court granted the request only in part. Specifically, I
ordered the fees be awarded, but, paid directly to Plaintiff instead of Plaintiff’s counsel.
Subsequent to this Order, the government has filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion for
reconsideration (doc. 29) stating that it will accept the now filed assignment. Furthermore,
the government does not oppose the award of fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel as it has
found Plaintiff does not owe any federal debt. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED:
1.
This Court’s previous order (doc. 27) is vacated.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (doc. 28) of this Court’s Order is
granted.
3.
Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $1,812.09. The fees shall be made
payable to Plaintiff’s counsel as the government has found the Plaintiff to
owe no federal debt.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on June 22, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?