Warder v. Kramp et al

Filing 24

ORDER: The Clerk is directed to REOPEN this case and return it to active status. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall effectuate service of a summons and the amended complaint upon each defendant against whom Plaintiff wishes to proceed in this lawsuit. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/18/2014. (LN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION

MATTHEW D. WARDER,
Plaintiff,
-vs-

Case No. 8:11-CV-291-T-30TBM

MATTHEW KRAMP, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on a sua sponte review of this case. On April 25,
2011, this case was stayed and administratively closed pending resolution of the applicable
Florida criminal proceedings against Plaintiff (see Dkt. 4). In his status reports to the Court,
Plaintiff asserts that the criminal proceedings against him were dismissed and remain inactive
(see Dkts. 19-23).
ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that:
1.

The Clerk is directed to REOPEN this case and return it to active status.

2.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall effectuate
service of a summons and the amended complaint upon each defendant against
whom Plaintiff wishes to proceed in this lawsuit.1

1

More than forty (40) defendants were named in the amended complaint (see Dkt. 12). Plaintiff is
cautioned that failure to timely perfect service without a showing of good cause for the delay may result in dismissal of
the claims against the unserved defendant(s).

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on July 18, 2014.

SA:sfc
Copy furnished:
Plaintiff pro se

2