Ramos et al v. Burger King Corporation
Filing
97
60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: No party (or their counsel) shall make any payment of fees or costs without prior authorization or approval from this Court. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/6/2012. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
SALOMON RAMOS, etc., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 8:11-cv-642-T-30MAP
BURGER KING CORPORATION,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
ORDER
The Court has been advised via a Mediation Report (Dkt. #96) that the above-styled action
has been settled. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 3.08(b), M.D.Fla., it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice
and subject to the right of the parties, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to submit a
stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen
the action, upon good cause shown. After that 60-day period, however, dismissal shall be with
prejudice. This Court retains jurisdiction during and after the sixty (60) day period to determine the
reasonableness of Plaintiffs' attorney's fees and costs. No party (or their counsel) shall make any
payment of fees or costs without prior authorization or approval from this Court. All pending
motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 6, 2012.
Copies to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
F:\Docs\2011\11-cv-642.dismiss 96.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?