Talk Fusion, Inc. v. Ulrich et al
Filing
34
ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Amended Temporary Restraining Order. The Amended Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in full force and effect until 5:00 p.m. on June 21, 2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/7/2011. (CR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
TALK FUSION, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO:
8:11-cv-1134-T-33AEP
J.J. ULRICH, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff
Talk
Fusion,
Inc.'s
Motion
to
Extend
Amended
Temporary
Restraining Order (Doc. # 32).
Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
permits a court to extend a temporary restraining order for 14
days "for good cause" or for a longer amount of time if the
adverse party consents.
There is no indication in the motion
that the adverse parties consent.
The Court does find,
however, good cause for a 14-day extension of the Amended
Temporary Restraining Order. Specifically, the extension will
allow time for Talk Fusion and Defendants Ulrich and Read to
confer regarding the scope of the preliminary injunction and
for Magistrate Judge Porcelli to set a hearing to consider the
preliminary injunction against Defendant I Wow We, who did not
attend the initial hearing on the preliminary injunction based
on the timing of service on I Wow We.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
Plaintiff Talk Fusion, Inc.'s Motion to Extend Amended
Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 32) is GRANTED.
The
Amended Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in full force
and effect until 5:00 p.m. on June 21, 2011, at which time it
shall expire by its terms unless extended by this Court upon
good cause shown, by consent of the parties, or by entry of a
subsequent preliminary injunction by this Court.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 7th
day of June, 2011.
Copies:
All Counsel of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?