Talk Fusion, Inc. v. Ulrich et al

Filing 34

ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Amended Temporary Restraining Order. The Amended Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in full force and effect until 5:00 p.m. on June 21, 2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/7/2011. (CR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TALK FUSION, INC., Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 8:11-cv-1134-T-33AEP J.J. ULRICH, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Talk Fusion, Inc.'s Motion to Extend Amended Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 32). Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to extend a temporary restraining order for 14 days "for good cause" or for a longer amount of time if the adverse party consents. There is no indication in the motion that the adverse parties consent. The Court does find, however, good cause for a 14-day extension of the Amended Temporary Restraining Order. Specifically, the extension will allow time for Talk Fusion and Defendants Ulrich and Read to confer regarding the scope of the preliminary injunction and for Magistrate Judge Porcelli to set a hearing to consider the preliminary injunction against Defendant I Wow We, who did not attend the initial hearing on the preliminary injunction based on the timing of service on I Wow We. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: Plaintiff Talk Fusion, Inc.'s Motion to Extend Amended Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 32) is GRANTED. The Amended Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in full force and effect until 5:00 p.m. on June 21, 2011, at which time it shall expire by its terms unless extended by this Court upon good cause shown, by consent of the parties, or by entry of a subsequent preliminary injunction by this Court. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 7th day of June, 2011. Copies: All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?