Kahama VI, LLC v. HJH, LLC et al
Filing
468
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Dkt. #434) is GRANTED in part as more fully set forth in the Foreclosure Judgment and Order of Private Sale (Dkt. #467). Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Sanctions and Contempt (Dkt. #439) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Judgment (Dkt. #440) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. #445) is DENIED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/9/2014. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
KAHAMA VI, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:11-cv-2029-T-30TBM
HJH, LLC, et. al.
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion for Miscellaneous
Relief (Dkt. #434) and Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Private Sale and Cross Motion
for Judgment (Dkt. #440), and Defendants’ Motion To Strike (Dkt. #445). Defendants
request that the Court permit Defendant Robert E.W. McMillan, III to market and sell the
property in a private sale for a period of twelve months at a minimum price of $665,000.
Plaintiff objects to the private sale, and requests that the Court enter a judgment on the
Third Amended Complaint, order a public sale, and appoint a Special Master to conduct
the sale. Defendants request that the Court strike Plaintiff’s Cross Motions (Dkt. #439 and
#440) due to their duplicative requests and failure to abide by Local Rule 3.01(g).
Upon review and consideration, it is therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Dkt. #434) is GRANTED in
part as more fully set forth in the Foreclosure Judgment and Order of Private
Sale (Dkt. #467).
2. Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Sanctions and Contempt (Dkt. #439) is
DENIED.
3. Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Judgment (Dkt. #440) is DENIED.
4. Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. #445) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 9th day of December, 2014.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Odd\2011\11-v-2029 439 440.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?