The Property Damage Advisory Committee v. Carey Canada, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER: The Orders of the Bankruptcy Court are AFFIRMED. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/3/2012. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION IN RE: CAREY CANADA, INC. THE PROPERTY DAMAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Appellant, v. Case No. 8:11-cv-2223-JSM THE CELOTEX ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST, Appellee. _____________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s March 24, 2011 Order on Property Damage Advisory Committee’s Motion to Compel Payment of Counsel’s Fees and July 8, 2011 Order on Property Damage Advisory Committee’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order on Property Damage Advisory Committee’s Motion to Compel Payment of Counsel’s Fees. The Court has considered the Appellant’s brief (Dkt. #13), the Appellee’s response (Dkt. #19), and Appellant’s reply (Dkt. #23). The Court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Since the appeal involves only questions concerning the legal conclusions of the Bankruptcy Court in interpreting the plan documents, appellate review by this Court is de novo. In Re: Celotex Corp., 487 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2007). The Court concludes that the Orders of the Bankruptcy Court are thorough and well reasoned, and are adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The Orders of the Bankruptcy Court are hereby AFFIRMED. 2. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and close this file. DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on February 3, 2012. Copies furnished to: Bankruptcy Court Judge Paul M. Glenn, Case #8:90-bk-10016-PMG Counsel/Parties of Record S:\Odd\2011\11-cv-2223.Celotex Order.frm Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?