Regions Bank v. Kaplan et al
Filing
346
ORDER granting 273 Motion for Final Default Judgment in favor of Crossclaimants Marvin I. Kaplan, Triple Net Exchange, LLC, MK Investing, LLC and BNK Smith LLC against G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith andSmith Advertising & Associates, Inc. The Clerk of Court shall enter a Final Default Judgment as to liability and entitlement to damages; the Court reserves jurisdiction to determine the amount of damages. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/24/2015. (JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
REGIONS BANK, etc.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP
MARVIN I. KAPLAN, etc.,
et al.,
Defendants.
MARVIN I. KAPLAN, etc.,
Counterclaim/
Crossclaim Plaintiffs,
v.
ROBERT NICHOLAS SHAW, et
al.,
Crossclaim Defendants.
/
ORDER
Dkt. 273
Motion for Final Default Judgment Against G. Todd
Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith and Smith
Advertising & Associates, Inc.
Crossclaimants Marvin I. Kaplan, R1A Palms, LLC, Triple Net Exchange, LLC,
MK Investing, LLC and BNK Smith, LLC (“Crossclaimants”) move for a Final Default
Judgment against G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith and Smith Advertising
& Associates, Inc. as to liability and entitlement to damages, with a reservation as to the
amount of damages, on the Amended Counterclaim and Crossclaim (Dkt. 93).
Case No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP
The Amended Counterclaim and Crossclaim includes the following claims as to
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith, and Smith Advertising & Associates, Inc.:
Count I
Fraud
G. Todd Smith, Smith Advertising
& Associates, Inc.
Count II
Conspiracy to
Defraud
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B.
Smith, Smith Advertising & Associates,
Inc.
Count III
Negligent
Misrepresentation
G. Todd Smith and Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count IV
Violation of 18 USC
Sec. 1962(c) and Sec.
1964
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy
B. Smith, Smith Advertising Associates,
Inc.
Count V
Violation of 18 USC Sec.
1962(d) and Sec. 1964
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy
B. Smith, and Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count VI
Violation of Secs.
772.103(3), 772.104,
Fla. Stat.
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy
B. Smith, Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count VII
Violation of Secs.
772.103(4), 772.104,
Fla. Stat.
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy
B. Smith, Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count VIII
Violation of Sec. 772.11,
Fla. Stat.
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy
B. Smith, Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count IX
Conversion
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B.
Smith and Smith Advertising &
Associates, Inc.
Count X
Violation of Sec. 501.201 G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B.
Smith, Smith Advertising & Associates,
et sea.. Fla. Stat..
FDUTPA
Inc.
2
Case No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP
Count XI
Violation of Sec. 68.065,
Fla. Stat.
Smith Advertising & Associates, Inc.
Count XII
Breach of Contract
Smith Advertising & Associates, Inc.,
G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith
Crossclaim Defendants G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith and Smith
Advertising & Associates, Inc. have been served. (Dkts. 137,168). A Clerk’s Default
has been entered as to all Crossclaim Defendants (Dkts. 139,169,170,171).
A defendant, by his default, admits a plaintiffs well-pleaded allegations of fact, is
concluded on those facts by the judgment, and is barred from contesting on appeal the
facts thus established. Eaale H osd. Physicians. LLC v. SRG Consulting. Inc.. 561 F.3d
1298,1308 (11th Cir. 2009). Under Florida law, a defendant still has the right to contest
unliquidated damages, but no other issue, once a default has been entered against
him. Banks v. SFRC Medical Dept. Officials. 2011 WL 900544 (S.D. Fla. 2011).
After consideration, the Court grants Crossclaimants’ Motion for Final Default
Judgment as to liability, and entitlement to damages; the Court reserves jurisdiction to
determine the amount of damages. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Crossclaimants’ Motion for Final Default Judgment (Dkt. 273) is
granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter a Final Default Judgment as to liability and
entitlement to damages in favor of Crossclaimants Marvin I. Kaplan, R1A Palms, LLC,
Triple Net Exchange, LLC, MK Investing, LLC and BNK Smith, LLC and against
Crossclaim Defendants G. Todd Smith, Gary T. Smith, Lucy B. Smith, and Smith
Advertising & Associates, Inc. on the above counts of the Amended Counterclaim and
Crossclaim (Dkt. 93). The Court reserves jurisdiction for determination of the amount
3
Case No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP
of damages.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida on thi
March, 2015.
Copies to:
4
'ay of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?