Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Michael G. Williams. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration and close this case. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/4/2014. (JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
MICHAEL G. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 8:12-CV-2395-T-17AEP
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the
United States Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on:
Dkt. 20
Report and Recommendation
In this case, Plaintiff Michael G. Williams sought judicial review of a final decision
of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs claim for Disability Insurance
Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The assigned Magistrate Judge has
entered a Report and Recommendation in which it is recommended that the decision of
the Commissioner be affirmed.
The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings, and Administrative Record.
(Dkt. 12). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. After
consideration, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, which is
incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, it is
Case No. 8:12-CV-2395-T-17AEP
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated;
the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to Plaintiff Williams is affirmed.
The Clerk of Court shall enter a final judgment in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, and close this
case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in 'fgmnpa, Florida on this 4th day of
February, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?