Compass Bank v. Evans, III et al
Filing
5
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to remand this case to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, and provide that court with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/30/2013. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
COMPASS BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 8:13-cv-1140-T-30MAP
RAYMOND M. EVANS, III; JULIANA L.
EVANS; RIVIERA BAY SUBDIVISION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.;
UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the notice of removal (Dkt. 1), complaint
(Dkt. 2), memorandum in support of notice of removal (Dkt. 3), and counterclaim against
Plaintiff Compass Bank (Dkt. 4). Upon review of these filings and being otherwise advised
in the premises, the Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction and this case should be
remanded to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County,
Florida.
On April 26, 2013, pro se Defendant Raymond M. Evans, III removed this action,
alleging that his counterclaim, filed simultaneously with his removal, raised a federal
question. It is plain from a review of the complaint filed in state court by Plaintiff Compass
Bank against Raymond M. Evans, III, Juliana L. Evans, Riviera Bay Subdivision
Homeowners Association, Inc., and Unknown Tenant in Possession that this is a foreclosure
action. Specifically, the action is to foreclose a mortgage on real property located in Pinellas
County, Florida.
The grounds for removal based on the existence of a federal question must appear “on
the face of the plaintiff’s properly pleaded complaint.” See Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482
U.S. 386, 392 (1987). Importantly, the federal question cannot arise from a defendant’s
counterclaim or defense. See Brown v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 934 F.2d 1193, 1195-96
(11th Cir. 1991).
This Court has the obligation to examine the removal sua sponte to determine if the
removal was proper. Here, Evans’ basis for removal mistakenly relies on his counterclaim
to establish a federal question; this, however, is insufficient. And the face of Compass
Bank’s complaint demonstrates that it is a typical foreclosure action under state law, not
federal law. Accordingly, this case is not removable under these circumstances.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
The Clerk is directed to remand this case to the Circuit Court of the Sixth
Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, and provide that court with
a copy of this Order.
2.
The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as
moot.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on April 30, 2013.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2013\13-cv-1140.remand.frm
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?