Munch v. Credit Protection Association, LP et al

Filing 66

ORDER adopting 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 62 MOTION for Taxation of Costs For Supplemental Work In Support of Report and Recommendation of Attorney Fees filed by William Munch., denying Motion. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/31/2015. (JM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
WILLIAM MUNCH,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 8:13-CV-1179-T-17EAJ

CREDIT PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER
This cause is before the Court on:
Dkt. 63

Report and Recommendation

Plaintiff William Munch has moved for the award of supplemental costs (Dkt. 62).

In the Report and Recommendation, the assigned Magistrate Judge
recommends that Plaintiffs Motion be denied.
No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court
has independently reviewed the pleadings and the record.

After consideration, the

Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, which is incorporated by reference.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation ( Dkt. 63) is adopted and
incorporated. Plaintiffs Motion for Supplemental Costs (Dkt. 62) is denied.

Case No. 8:13-CV-1179-T-17EAJ

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida on this 31st day of
March, 2015.