Lee v. Equity Properties Asset Management, Inc. et al
Filing
207
ORDER: The Parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement 205 is GRANTED to the extent described herein. The Court approves the settlement agreement with one change. With respect to paragraph six of the agreement, the Court wil l retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the agreement for only one (1) year. As required by the settlement agreement's terms, the Parties shall move to dismiss this case with prejudice once the conditions set forth in the settlement agreement have been satisfied. The Court retains jurisdiction to resolve the issues raised in Plaintiff's Motion to Discharge the Charging Lien 206 . Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 1/19/2017. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
JACK M. LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:13-cv-2239-T-30AAS
EQUITY PROPERTIES ASSET
MANAGEMENT, INC., EQUITY
PROPERTIES ASSET MANAGEMENT,
INC. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION
PLAN and JACQUELINE S. CHANG,
Defendants.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval
of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 205). The Court approves the settlement agreement with
one change. With respect to paragraph six of the agreement, the Court will retain
jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the agreement for only one (1) year.
As required by the settlement agreement’s terms, the Parties shall move to dismiss
this case with prejudice once the conditions set forth in the settlement agreement have been
satisfied.
The Court retains jurisdiction to resolve the issues raised in Plaintiff’s Motion to
Discharge the Charging Lien (Dkt. 206).
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Parties’ Joint
Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 205) to the extent described herein.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on January 19th, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?