Whitehead v. Roger et al

Filing 7

ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Plea Relief Requested 6 is STRICKEN. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the form "Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241." Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/10/2016. (LN)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION WILLIE FRANK WHITEHEAD, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:14-cv-1060-T-30EAJ ALCOTT ROGER, et al., Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Plea Relief Requested (Doc. 6), which appears to request release from state custody. Plaintiff previously filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which was dismissed without prejudice, and this case was closed. Because the present motion was filed in a closed case, it should be stricken. Additionally, it is difficult to understand precisely the nature of Plaintiff’s complaints and the claims he seeks to raise. He appears to indicate that he is a pretrial detainee in the custody of the State of Florida. To the extent he seeks release from the custody of the State of Florida as a pretrial detainee, any such relief is more appropriately sought pursuant to a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 5). The Court will therefore direct the Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of the form “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.” The Court does not suggest, however, that any such petition would have merit. Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Plea Relief Requested (Doc. 6) is STRICKEN. 2. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the form “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.” DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 10th day of March, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel/Parties of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?