Scott v. Sarasota Doctors Hospital, Inc. et al
Filing
101
ORDER: Defendant Emcare, Inc.'s Motion for Taxation of Costs 95 and Proposed Bill of Costs 96 are granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a Bill of Costs in the amount of $3,202.10 in Defendant Emcare, Inc.'s favor and against Plaintiff for taxable costs. This amount shall accrue interest at the relevant federal statutory rate. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/1/2015. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
DR. MICHELLE G. SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 8:14-cv-1762-T-30TBM
SARASOTA DOCTOR HOSPITAL,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Emcare, Inc.’s Motion for
Taxation of Costs (Dkt. 95) and Proposed Bill of Costs (Dkt. 96). On November 20, 2015,
the Court directed Plaintiff to file a notice on or before November 27, 2015, indicating if she
intended to file an opposition to the request for costs. Plaintiff did not file any opposition by
that time. The Court, having reviewed the filings and being otherwise advised in the
premises, grants Emcare’s motion and proposed bill of costs.
Emcare seeks costs in the amount of $3,202.10 related to fees for transcripts
necessarily obtained for use in the case. These costs are recoverable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Defendant Emcare, Inc.’s Motion for Taxation of Costs (Dkt. 95) and
Proposed Bill of Costs (Dkt. 96) are granted.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a Bill of Costs in the amount of
$3,202.10 in Defendant Emcare, Inc.’s favor and against Plaintiff for taxable
costs. This amount shall accrue interest at the relevant federal statutory rate.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on December 1, 2015.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2014\14-cv-1762.emcare-costs-95.wpd
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?