Office of the Attorney General et al v. Berger Law Group, P.A. et al

Filing 48

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 45 of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. A Preliminary Injunction will be entered against Defendants Litigation Law, LLC, the Resolution Law Group, P.C., and the Resolut ion Law Center, LLC, as proposed by Plaintiff in their motion for ex parte temporary restraining order with asset freeze and other equitable relief and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue 6 . Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/15/2014. (LN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL and STATE OF
CONNECTICUT,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 8:14-cv-1825-T-30MAP

BERGER LAW GROUP, P.A., IAN
BERGER, LITIGATION LAW, LLC,
GARY DIGIROLAMO, THE
RESOLUTION LAW GROUP, P.C., R.
GEOFFREY BRODERICK, THE
RESOLUTION LAW CENTER, LLC,
DAVID FRIEDMAN, STEPHEN R.
KOPOLOW, P.C., STEPHEN RANDALL
KOPOLOW, ONISAK, LLC,
REMARQUE HOLDINGS, LLC, PHILIP
KRAMER and CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT
FOX,
Defendants.

ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation
submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. #45). The Court notes that neither
party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing
such objections has elapsed.
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the

opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted,
confirmed, and approved in all respects.
ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #45) of the Magistrate Judge is

adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all
purposes, including appellate review.
2.

A Preliminary Injunction will be entered against Defendants Litigation Law,

LLC, the Resolution Law Group, P.C., and the Resolution Law Center, LLC, as proposed
by Plaintiff in their motion for ex parte temporary restraining order with asset freeze and
other equitable relief and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not
issue (Dkt. #6).
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 15th day of September, 2014.

Copies Furnished To:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Odd\2014\14-cv-1825 adopt 45.docx

2