Monpoint v. Specialized Loan Servicing
Filing
5
ORDER granting 4 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 12/1/2014. (KE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
EVELYNE MONPOINT,
Plaintiff,
Case No: 8:14-cv-2231-T-27TGW
v.
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING,
Defendant.
ORDER
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC's Motion to
Dismiss Complaint (Dkt. 4). Plaintiff, who is proceeding prose, has not responded and the time in
which to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff will
be granted 21 days to amend her complaint.
Prose litigants are subject to the same law and rules of court as litigants who are represented
by counsel, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of the United States
District Court for the Middle District of Florida ("Local Rule(s)"). Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d
835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989). Rule 8 requires that a complaint contain "a short and plain statement of
the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). This does not require
detailed factual allegations, but it demands more than an unadorned, conclusory accusation of harm.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Although a plaintiff is not required to set forth an
intricately detailed description of the asserted basis for relief, it is required that the pleadings "give
the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Conley
v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957). While a prose litigant's pleadings must be construed liberally,
1
''this leniency does not give a court license to serve as de facto counsel for a party, or to rewrite an
otherwise deficient pleading in order to sustain an action." McCone v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., No.
14-11119, 2014 WL 4377868, at *1 (11th Cir. Sept. 5, 2014).
Plaintiffs Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8. It includes a number of legal authorities
and citations but it is impossible to discern what legal claim Plaintiff is asserting against Defendant.
Plaintiff appears to seek pre-suit discovery, but does not explain what discovery she seeks, or cite
any relevant authority supporting the availability of discovery.
Plaintiff appears to seek a declaration under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U .S.C. ยง 2201,
but the Declaratory Judgment Act is "operative only in respect to controversies which are such in
the constitutional sense." Wendy's Int'/, Inc. v. City of Birmingham, 868 F.2d 433, 435 (11th Cir.
1989). Plaintiff must meet the constitutional requirements of a case or controversy:
At an irreducible minimum, the party who invokes the court's authority
under Article ill must show: (1) that they personally have suffered some
actual or threatened injury as a result of the alleged conduct of the
defendant; (2) that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action;
and (3) that it is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.
GTE Directories Pub. Corp. v. Trimen Am., Inc., 67 F.3d 1563, 1567 (11th Cir. 1995). When the
Declaratory Judgment Act is at issue, the "question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under
all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between parties having adverse
legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory
judgment." Md Cas. Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co., 312 U.S. 270, 273 (1941). Here, the Complaint
does not state the relevant facts with the requisite specificity for the Court to determine whether there
is an actual case ripe for disposition.
Accordingly, the Complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. In filing an amended
complaint, Plaintiff must comply with the Rules and clearly identify. the basis for her claims and
2
requested relief. In addition, to the extent Plaintiff brings claims under the Declaratory Judgment
Act, she must demonstrate there is an actual case or controversy that "appropriate for judicial
determination." Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 240 (1937).
NOTICE TO PRO SE PARTY
Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will take the opportunity to inform her of
some, but not all, of the procedural rules with which Plaintiff must comply. Plaintiff shall not
correspond with the Court or any Judge or Magistrate Judge of the Court in letter form. In keeping
with their sworn duty to maintain complete impartiality in the exercise of their judicial duties, the
Judges of this Court will only deliver their decisions and opinions in response to those documents
filed with the Clerk's Office in accordance with the governing rules of procedure.
Any
correspondence sent to judicial officers will not be responded to, will he stricken from the case file,
and will be returned to the sending party.
All documents filed with the Court must be in the form of a pleading, see Fed. R. Civ. P.
7(a), or a motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b). Each pleading, motion, notice, or other paper shall be
presented in a separate document. In addition, all documents filed with the Court by Plaintiff must
include a caption (the same as is set forth on Plaintiffs Complaint); a brief title that describes the
nature of the document; the filing party's name and signature; and a Certificate of Service. These
last two items are explained below.
All pleadings, motions, or other papers filed with the Court by Plaintiff must bear an original
signature of Plaintiff, or they will be rejected by the Court. Among other things, the signature serves
as the party's certification, pursuant to Rule 1 l(b), that the document is not submitted for any
improper purpose; that the claims or defenses presented in it are warranted by existing law; and that
there exists reasonable factual support for the allegations or assertions made. Plaintiff is advised to
3
review and become familiar with Rule 11, as the failure to comply with its provisions can result in
the imposition of sanctions, including monetary fines.
All pleadings, motions, or other papers filed with the Court by Plaintiff must. also include a
signed Certificate of Service. The Certificate of Service is confirmation that the filing party has
complied with the requirement of Rule 5 by serving on every other party to the action (or its
attorney) a copy of the particular pleading, motion, or other paper filed with the Court. At a
minimum, a Certificate of Service must state the date upon which a copy of the particular document
was served on the other parties to the action (or their attorneys) and the means by which such service
was made (e.g., U.S. Mail; Federal Express; hand delivery).
As previously mentioned, all requests for relief from, or action by, the Court must be in the
form of a motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b). If Plaintiff seeks any relief from, or action by, the Court,
or seeks the entry of an order of any kind, Plaintiff must file a proper motion requesting that relief.
The motion must meet the requirements of all applicable rules, including the Rules and the Local
Rules. All motions must be accompanied by a legal memorandum with citation of authorities in
support of the relief requested. See Local Rule 3.0l(a). However, the motion and memorandum
cannot exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length. See id.
Further, Plaintiff is advised that prior to filing most motions, Local Rule 3. 01 (g) requires that
the filing party confer with opposing counsel in a good faith attempt to resolve the issue. Plaintiff
must include a certification in the motion that she has complied with this requirement and shall also
notify the Court whether the parties agree on the relief requested. The Court would note that Local
. Rule 3. 01 sets forth several other important requirements and rules governing motions filed with the
Court. Failure to comply with these requirements or any other rule may result in the denial of the
motion.
4
Plaintiff is also cautioned that she must abide by and comply with all orders of this Court.
Failure to do so may result in sanctions, including the striking of pleadings.
Local Rule 3.0l(b) further requires that any brief or legal memorandum in opposition to a
motion must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with that motion by opposing
counsel. Plaintiff must timely respond to the motions filed by other parties in this case, for if she
does not timely respond to such a motion, the Court may assume that she does not oppose that
motion and the relief requested therein. If Plaintiff has missed a filing deadline, Plaintiff must file
a motion seeking leave of Court to file the document out of time.
Lastly, Plaintiff is reminded that, although she is proceedingpro se, she is not relieved of all
of the obligations that rest upon an attorney. There are still many requirements with which she must
comply, including those imposed by the Rules and the Local Rules. Plaintiff is warned that the
failure to comply with these requirements and obligations can have significant consequences. For
example, failure to respond to discovery requests as described in the rules may result in sanctions.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.
While the Court has set forth some of the more prominent procedural obligations and
requirements of litigants in this Court, this Order does not purport to set forth all of those
requirements and should not be relied upon as limiting Plaintiffs duties and obligations in litigating
this case. Plaintiff is referred to the Court's website at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov. There is a
section titled Proceeding Without a Lawyer with additional helpful information.
Accordingly,
1.
Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Dkt.
4) is GRANTED.
5
2.
Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3.
Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (14)
days of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint by this deadline will result in dismissal of
this case without further notice.
4.
Plaintiff shall review and comply with the provisions of this Order, as well as the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Florida, and any applicable statutes and regulations.
DONE AND ORDERED this
L11- day o~ , 2014.
Copies to:
Counsel of Record
Pro se Plaintiff
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?