Edwards v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER ATTACHED denying 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct sentence (2255). The clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendant and to CLOSE the case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because Plaintiff has failed to m ake a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. section 2253(c)(2). The Court also declines to allow Plaintiff to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3) because his appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard A. Lazzara on 12/2/2014. (CCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JAMES EDWARDS, JR., Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 8:14-cv-2983-T-26AEP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / ORDER Upon due and careful consideration of the procedural history of the Plaintiff’s underlying criminal case,1 the Court concludes that the Plaintiff is entitled to no relief in that his Motion to Vacate filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on November 24, 2014, is clearly time-barred. The Plaintiff’s direct appeal was dismissed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on September 27, 2011.2 As noted above, the Plaintiff did not file his motion until November 24, 2014, or more than one year after his conviction became final. Thus, his motion is clearly timebarred under the provisions of §2255(f)(1). Furthermore, the Plaintiff has utterly failed to plead sufficient facts entitling him to the benefit of equitable tolling. 1 See case number 8:10-cr-461-T-26AEP. 2 See id., docket 33. Accordingly, it is ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate (Dkt. 1) is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the Defendant and to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on December 2, 2014. s/Richard A. Lazzara RICHARD A. LAZZARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record Plaintiff, pro se -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?