United States of America v. $200,686.00 in U.S. Currency
Filing
18
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 15 is DENIED. Claimants have sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to resolve their tax obligations with the Franchise Tax Board. If the issue is not resolved during that time, the United States may renew the motion to strike. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/15/2016. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:15-cv-2212-T-30AEP
$200,686.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. #15)
and Claimants’ Response (Dkt. #17) thereto. Upon review and consideration, the Court
determines that the Motion should be denied.
Discussion
On September 22, 2015, the United States filed a civil forfeiture case against the
Defendant Currency (Dkt. #1). On January 28, 2016, Alfred P. Byrne filed a verified
claim (Dkt. #10). On February 2, 2016, the United States advised Byrne’s counsel that
the claim was deficient and would need to be re-filed on behalf of the corporations who
claim ownership of the Defendant Currency. 1 Byrne’s counsel agreed to file an amended
claim and an answer to the complaint.
On May 4, 2016, Urban PCS, LLC, Liberty PCS, LLC, and Vallego Business
Services, LLC, d/b/a Biz Zone (“Claimants”) filed revised verified claims (Dkt. #13) and
1
According to the United States, Alfred Byrne did not have standing to file a claim because
the seized money belonged to three corporations.
answers (Dkt. #14).
It appears that Claimants are limited liability corporations
incorporated under the laws of California (Dkt. #13).
The United States now moves to strike Claimants’ revised verified claims and
answers because they have been suspended and have lost all rights and privileges as
corporations, including the right to sue or defend any action in court. Specifically, the
United States notes that, according to the California Secretary of State website
(http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/), all three of the LLCs are suspended or forfeited by the Franchise
Tax Board for failure to meet tax requirements (e.g., failure to file a return, pay taxes,
penalties, interest). As such, the United States contends that this Court should strike
Claimants’ claims and answers.
Claimants’ response to the motion states that they have consulted with “Joshua
Cooper CPA, a California accountant who represents all three Claimants” and Cooper has
advised them that the “suspended” status is a common status by the California Secretary
of State and simply refers to the fact that the LLC’s have not yet filed their current tax
returns (Dkt. #17). Claimants further state that Cooper is preparing updated tax returns
for Claimants and that, when the returns are filed and the related tax payments are made,
Claimants’ status will return to active.
The Court concludes that it would be premature to strike Claimants’ filings at this
time in light of their promise to immediately redress their pending tax obligations.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. #15) is DENIED.
2
2.
Claimants have sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to resolve their
tax obligations with the Franchise Tax Board. If the issue is not resolved
during that time, the United States may renew the motion to strike.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 15th day of June, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Even\2015\15-cv-2212 strike 15.docx
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?