Phelan Holdings, Inc. v. Rare Hospitality Management, Inc.
Filing
67
ORDER: Defendant's Motions for Attorney's Fees and Costs 57 58 are denied without prejudice to refile within thirty (30) days after entry of a mandate by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/18/2017. (LN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
PHELAN HOLDINGS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO: 8:15-CV-2294-T-30TBM
RARE HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT,
INC.,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motions for Attorney’s Fees
and Costs (Dkts. 57, 58) and Plaintiff’s Responses in Opposition (Dkts. 64, 65). Upon
review and consideration, the Court denies the motions without prejudice in light of
Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (Dkt. 62).
On March 27, 2017, the Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on
the entirety of Plaintiff’s claims (Dkt. 55). On March 28, 2017, final judgment was entered
in Defendant’s favor (Dkt. 56). On April 11, 2017, Defendant moved for prevailing party
attorney’s fees and costs (Dkts. 57, 58). On April 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal
(Dkt. 62). On May 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed responses in opposition to Defendant’s motions
for fees and costs (Dkts. 65, 66). Plaintiff’s responses note, in relevant part, that Defendant’s
motions are premature in light of the pending appeal.
A district court has the discretion to deny a motion for fees and costs without
prejudice “[if] an appeal on the merits of the case is taken.” Democratic Republic of the
Congo v. Air Capital Grp., LLC, No. 12-20607-CIV-ROSENBAUM, 2014 WL 12634405,
at *1 (S.D. Fla. May 8, 2014) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) advisory committee’s note);
see also Hetrick v. Ideal Image Dev. Corp., No. 8:07-cv-871-T-33-TBM, 2009 WL 1788376,
at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 22, 2009) (“[t]he Court has discretion to deny a motion for attorney’s
fees and costs without prejudice to re-file after the appeal has concluded.”).
In light of Plaintiff’s appeal, the Court exercises its discretion to deny Defendant’s
motions for fees and costs without prejudice. The Court’s decision is also influenced by Fla.
Stat. § 501.2105(1)—one of the statutes under which Defendant seeks its entitlement to fees
and costs—which states that “the prevailing party, after judgment in the trial court and
exhaustion of all appeals, if any, may receive his or her reasonable attorney’s fees and costs
from the nonprevailing party.” (emphasis added). It is also worth noting that attorney’s fees
and costs are frequently resolved in appellate mediation. See Hetrick, 2009 WL 1788376,
at *2 (noting same).
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Defendant’s Motions for
Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Dkts. 57, 58) are denied without prejudice to refile within thirty
(30) days after entry of a mandate by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on May 18, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?