Barr v. One Touch Direct, LLC et al

Filing 50

ORDER: Defendants One Touch Direct, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., and DPG Employee Leasing LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 43 ) is granted as stated in the Order. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and, thereafter, close this case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/23/2016. (DRW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
ALFRED BARR,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 8:15-cv-2391-T-33MAP

ONE TOUCH DIRECT, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This

matter

comes

before

the

Court

pursuant

to

Defendants One Touch Direct, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., and
DPG Employee Leasing LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 43). One
Touch Direct, AT&T, and DPG Employee Leasing seek dismissal
of the Complaint in its entirety based on the argument that
the Complaint is a shotgun pleading. See Weiland v. Palm Beach
Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 792 F.3d 1313, 1321-23 (11th Cir. 2015)
(categorizing the different types of shotgun pleadings).
Plaintiff Alfred Barr’s response was due on February 22, 2016.
However, as of the date of this Order, Barr has not filed a
response

and,

unopposed.

as

such,

Therefore,

the

Court
case

this

prejudice.
Accordingly, it is

1 

treats
is

the

Motion

dismissed

as

without

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
(1)

Defendants One Touch Direct, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc.,
and DPG Employee Leasing LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
# 43) is GRANTED as stated herein.

(2)

This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is
directed

to

terminate

any

pending

motions

and,

thereafter, close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this
23rd day of February, 2016.

2