Nielsen Audio, Inc. v. Clem et al

Filing 128

ORDER granting in part 123 Motion for an Order Determining that Plaintiff's Discovery Production "N008" is Not Entitled to be Treated as "Confidential-Attorney's Eyes Only." See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 7/18/2017. (BEE)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NIELSEN AUDIO, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 8:15-cv-2435-T-27AAS BUBBA CLEM a/k/a BUBBA THE LOVE SPONGE and BUBBA RADIO NETWORK, INC., Defendants. ______________________________________/ ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Emergency Motion for an Order Determining that Plaintiff’s Discovery Production “N008” is Not Entitled to be Treated as “Confidential-Attorney’s Eyes Only” (Doc. 123), and responses in opposition thereto (Docs. 125, 126). On July 18, 2017, the parties appeared before the undersigned for oral argument on Defendants’ Emergency Motion. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, it is ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Emergency Motion for an Order Determining that Plaintiff’s Discovery Production “N008” is Not Entitled to be Treated as “Confidential-Attorney’s Eyes Only” (Doc. 123) is GRANTED to the extent that discovery production N008 shall not be designated as “Confidential-Attorney’s Eyes Only” pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreed Protective Order Regarding Confidential Information (Doc. 41-1, pp. 4-5). However, discovery production N008 shall be designated “Confidential” under Sections 2 and 3 of the Agreed Protective Order, and is entitled to all protections provided therein. (Id., pp. 2-4). (2) Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in relation to this 1 Motion (Doc. 123). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on this 18th day of July, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?