Centennial Bank v. ServisFirst Bank Inc. et al
Filing
203
ORDER denying as moot 177 Motion to Stay by Non-Parties Gwynn Davey and Patrick Murrin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 11/16/2016. (LBL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
CENTENNIAL BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 8:16-cv-88-T-36JSS
SERVISFIRST BANK INC., GREGORY
W. BRYANT, GWYNN DAVEY,
PATRICK MURRIN, and JONATHAN
ZUNZ,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Stay By Non-Parties Gwynn Davey
and Patrick Murrin (“Motion”) (Dkt. 177), filed by Gwynn Davey and Patrick Murrin (“ServisFirst
Employees”), and Plaintiff’s response in opposition (Dkt. 180). The ServisFirst Employees seek
a stay of their production of indemnification agreements the ServisFirst Employees were ordered
to produce “until it is determined whether [the ServisFirst Employees] will become parties to this
action.” (Dkts. 165, 177.)
At the time the Motion was filed, the ServisFirst Employees were not parties to this action,
but Plaintiff sought leave to file a second amended complaint that would name the ServisFirst
Employees as defendants. (Dkt. 149.) Since the filing of the Motion, the Court entered an order
granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint without prejudice to Plaintiff
to file a second amended complaint and denied as moot Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second
amended complaint in light of the dismissal without prejudice. (Dkts. 193–196, 198.)
Plaintiff has filed its second amended complaint, naming the ServisFirst Employees as
defendants. (Dkt. 199.) Therefore, the Court resolved Plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint
(Dkt. 194), and Plaintiff has named the ServisFirst Employees as defendants in this action (Dkt.
199). As such, the relief sought in the Motion is moot. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Motion to Stay By Non-Parties Gwynn Davey and Patrick Murrin
(Dkt. 177), is DENIED as moot.
DONE and ORDERED, in Tampa, Florida, on November 16, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?