Trubey v. United States of America
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 2/3/2017. (JD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
STEVEN CHRISTOPHER TRUBY
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 8:16-cv-1737-T-24TBM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
/
ORDER
Petitioner Steven Christopher Truby, represented by counsel, filed an Application
for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 20). Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion to
Vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as well as Petitioner’s underlying criminal case,
Petitioner’s Application is denied because Petitioner has not made a showing of the denial
of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
Petitioner seeks to extend the holding in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551
(2015), to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) on collateral review. Johnson affords Petitioner no
collateral relief with regard to his § 924(c) conviction because Johnson did not address
the statute under which Petitioner was convicted. The Supreme Court has never held that
any part of § 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague. Nor has the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals extended Johnson’s vagueness determination to § 924(c). However, even if
reasonable jurists could find it debatable under Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478
(2000), as to whether Johnson extends to the residual clause under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c),
Petitioner’s conviction for attempted bank robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under
§924(c)’s use-of-force clause. See In re Sams, 830 F3d 1234(11th Cir. 2016) (holding
conviction for bank robbery by force, violence and intimidation was a crime of violence
under 924(c)’s use-of-force clause); In re Hines, 824 F. 3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2016) (holding
armed bank robbery is a crime of violence under 924(c)’s use-of -force clause).
ACCORDINGLY, for the reasons expressed, Petitioner’s Application for
Certificate of Appealability is denied.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on February 3, 2017.
Copies to: Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?