Menard v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER granting 27 Consent Petition for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 12/1/2017. (DMP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No.: 8:16-cv-2260-T-AAS
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, acting
Commissioner of Social Security,1
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Petition for Attorney Fees. (Doc.
27). Plaintiff asserts that the Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (Id. at 3).
Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,913.37 pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff asks for $770.72 in fees for work performed on
the case in 2016, calculated at a rate of $192.68 per hour for 4 hours, and $6,142.65 in fees for
work performed on the case in 2017, calculated at a rate of $195.26 per hour for 31 hours.2
The Court entered an order reversing and remanding the case under sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 25). The Clerk
entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff the next day. (Doc. 26). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff
now requests an award of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1) & (d)(1)(A). As judgment for Plaintiff
Between the filing of this suit and the entry of this Order, Nancy A. Berryhill replaced Carolyn
W. Colvin as acting Commissioner. As such, Ms. Berryhill is “automatically substituted as a
party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
The undersigned finds the hourly rates requested reasonable in light of Consumer Price Index
Inflation Calculator. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (“[A]ttorney fees shall not be awarded in
excess of $125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living . . . justifies
a higher fee.”).
was entered on September 14, 2017, and Plaintiff filed her Petition for Attorney’s Fees on
November 29, 2017, the Court has jurisdiction to award the requested fees. See 28 U.S.C. §
After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, however, the United States Department of
the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no
discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and pay
the fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. (Doc. 27-1, pp. 2–3).
For the reasons set out in Plaintiff’s motion, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Consent Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. 27) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is awarded $6,913.37 in attorney’s fees pursuant to the EAJA.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 1st day of December, 2017.
The sixty-day appeal period expired on November 14, 2017, at which point the Court’s judgment
became final. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(b). Therefore, Plaintiff’s deadline for filing a petition
for EAJA fees is December 15, 2017. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B); see also Fed. R. Civ. P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?