Manner et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 23 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including ap pellate review. (2) The parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement 22 is GRANTED. (3) The parties' Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc. 22, Ex. A) is approved, including all terms and conditio ns. It constitutes a valid nonjudicial settlement agreement under Section 736.0111, Florida Statutes, and a valid consent, release, and ratification by the Beneficiaries under Section 736.1012, Florida Statutes. (4) The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/5/2017. (BGS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
SCOTT D. MANNER, GARY M.
MANNER and HOLLY M. COVIELLO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 8:16-cv-2799-T-36AEP
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by
Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on April 27, 2017 (Doc. 23).
In the Report and
Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Porcelli recommended that the Court grant the parties’ Joint
Motion for Approval of Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement (Doc. 22). The Magistrate Judge noted
that the parties constitute interested persons under the statute. See Fla. Stat. § 736.0111(1).
Plaintiffs are the Beneficiaries of the three trusts created under the Third Amended and Restated
Revocable Trust Agreement of Robert J. Manner, dated April 18, 2006, as amended as of July 31,
2007 (the “Trust Agreement” and “Revocable Trust”), including the trust for the benefit of Gary
M. Manner (“Gary’s Trust”), the trust for the benefit of Holly M. Coviello (“Holly’s Trust”), and
the trust for the benefit of Scott D. Manner (“Scott’s Trust”) (collectively, the “Trusts”). Defendant
is the current Trustee for the Trusts. As such, the parties are permitted to seek court approval of
their Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement and Release. See Fla. Stat. § 736.0111(5). The Magistrate
Judge further noted that pursuant to Florida law and the terms of the Nonjudicial Settlement
Agreement and Release (Doc. 22, Ex. A), the parties agree to numerous terms and conditions,
including but not limited to:
(i)
the resignation of Defendant as trustee of the Trusts;
(ii)
the appointment of the Coral Gables Trust Company as successor
corporate trustee of the Trusts;
(iii)
the payment to Defendant of its regular fiduciary compensation
from each of the Trusts;
(iv)
the payment to Defendant from the assets of the Trusts in equal
shares, its attorneys’ fees, court costs, and other costs incurred through the
transfer of the assets in the Trusts, in accordance with Section 736.0802,
Florida Statutes;
(i)
the final discharge of Defendant from any and all fiduciary
obligations and liabilities related to the Trusts.
The Magistrate Judge concluded that the parties’ Nonjudicial Settlement
Agreement and Release constituted a valid nonjudicial settlement agreement under Section
736.0111, Florida Statutes, and a valid consent, release, and ratification by the
Beneficiaries under Section 736.1012, Florida Statutes. Thereafter, the Magistrate Judge
recommended the approval of the Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc.
22, Ex. A), including all terms and conditions set forth therein. All parties were furnished
copies of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded the opportunity to file
objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed.
Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court’s
independent examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation
should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now
2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 23) is adopted,
confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all
purposes, including appellate review.
(2)
The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement (Doc.
22) is GRANTED.
(3)
The parties’ Nonjudicial Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc. 22, Ex. A) is
approved, including all terms and conditions. It constitutes a valid nonjudicial
settlement agreement under Section 736.0111, Florida Statutes, and a valid consent,
release, and ratification by the Beneficiaries under Section 736.1012, Florida
Statutes.
(4)
The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on June 5, 2017.
Copies to:
The Honorable Anthony E. Porcelli
Counsel of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?