Scotto v. Smiesk et al

Filing 9

ORDER dismissing case. The Clerk is directed to return the above-referenced documents to Plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 12/8/2016. (LN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION

LIVIA M. SCOTTO,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 8:16-cv-2941-T-30JSS

JEFF SMIESK, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On November 7, 2016, this Court issued an Order (Dkt. #6) directing Plaintiff to
file an Amended Complaint within twenty days that complied with the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, failing which this case would be dismissed without further notice.
On December 1, 2016, the Court received another set of incomprehensible
documents from the pro se Plaintiff.

Upon review and consideration, the Court

determines this case must be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rules
1.05, 1.06 and 3.01(a). In short, the Complaint fails to allege a clear and concise cause of
action. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1.

This cause is dismissed.

2.

The Clerk is directed to return the above-referenced documents to Plaintiff.

3.

The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 8th day of December, 2016.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record
S:\Odd\2016\16-cv-2941 dismissal.docx

2